Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
omit property
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Ramda vs Native
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.26.1/ramda.js"></script>
Tests:
Ramda
const props = {"value":86.51,"isLocked":false,"isPrivate":false,"meta":{"currencyCode":"GBP","languageCode":"en","fallbackLanguages":[],"localeCode":"en","isRTLLanguage":false,"userCountryCode":"US","includeTaxes":false,"includeLocalTaxes":false,"anonymousId":"cd73d96b-18fa-46c3-8a2e-75f524dd2874","brand":{"code":"google","name":"google","defaultDomain":"google.com"},"deviceCategory":"desktop","session":{},"dateConfig":{"firstDayOfWeek":1,"weekdaysShort":["Su","Mo","Tu","We","Th","Fr","Sa"],"months":["January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"]}}} const priceProps = R.omit(['meta'], props)
Native
const props = {"value":86.51,"isLocked":false,"isPrivate":false,"meta":{"currencyCode":"GBP","languageCode":"en","fallbackLanguages":[],"localeCode":"en","isRTLLanguage":false,"userCountryCode":"US","includeTaxes":false,"includeLocalTaxes":false,"anonymousId":"cd73d96b-18fa-46c3-8a2e-75f524dd2874","brand":{"code":"google","name":"google","defaultDomain":"google.com"},"deviceCategory":"desktop","session":{},"dateConfig":{"firstDayOfWeek":1,"weekdaysShort":["Su","Mo","Tu","We","Th","Fr","Sa"],"months":["January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"]}}} const { meta, ...priceProps } = props
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Ramda
Native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition:** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case named "omit property". The benchmark definition is not explicitly stated in the JSON, but it can be inferred that this test case compares two approaches to omitting a specific property from an object. **Script Preparation Code:** The script preparation code for this benchmark is empty, which means that no additional setup or initialization code is required before running the tests. **Html Preparation Code:** The HTML preparation code includes a link to a Ramda.js library file, which is used in one of the test cases. This suggests that the Ramda library is used as a dependency for this benchmark. **Individual Test Cases:** There are two individual test cases: 1. **"Ramda"** This test case uses the Ramda library to omit the "meta" property from an object. The code snippet is: ``` const props = { ... } const priceProps = R.omit(['meta'], props) ``` The Ramda library provides a function `R.omit` that takes an array of property names to omit and returns a new object with those properties removed. Pros: * Efficient use of the Ramda library, which is likely optimized for performance. * Clear and concise code snippet that directly addresses the benchmark's requirement. Cons: * The test case relies on the availability of the Ramda library, which may not be present in all environments. * The code snippet may require additional setup or initialization to work correctly in certain scenarios. 2. **"Native"** This test case omits the "meta" property from an object using a native JavaScript approach: ``` const props = { ... } const { meta, ...priceProps } = props ``` The syntax `{ ... }` is called destructuring assignment, which allows us to extract specific properties from an object and assign them to new variables. Pros: * Native JavaScript implementation avoids reliance on external libraries. * Destructuring assignment is a modern JavaScript feature that can be used in many scenarios. Cons: * May not be as efficient as the Ramda library approach for large objects or complex property names. * Requires knowledge of destructuring assignment syntax, which may not be familiar to all developers. **Other Alternatives:** While the Ramda library approach is efficient and concise, other alternatives could have been used in this benchmark. Some examples include: * Using a `for...in` loop to iterate over properties and remove the "meta" key. * Employing a more advanced object manipulation technique, such as using `Object.assign()` or `Object.create()`. * Utilizing a specialized library like Lodash, which provides similar functionality to Ramda. **Special JS Features/Syntax:** None of the test cases use special JavaScript features or syntax that require explanation. The code snippets are straightforward and easily understandable for developers familiar with JavaScript basics. Overall, this benchmark highlights the importance of choosing the right approach for omitting properties from an object, considering factors such as performance, conciseness, and compatibility with different environments.
Related benchmarks:
ramdajs contains
ramdajs contains
Lodash vs Ramda fromPairs
Ramda vs vanilla JS
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?