Benchmark: RAMDAvsNATIVE - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

obj1 = {
    gridOptions: {
      defaultColDef: {
        resizable: true,
        sortable: true,
        floatingFilterComponentParams: {
          suppressFilterButton: true,
        },
      },
      floatingFilter: false,
      floatingFiltersHeight: 46,
      headerHeight: 40,
      suppressDragLeaveHidesColumns: true,
      suppressHorizontalScroll: true,
      suppressNoRowsOverlay: true,
      suppressRowClickSelection: false,
      suppressScrollOnNewData: true,
      rowSelection: 'single',
      rowHeight: 40,
    },
    customParams: {
      pagination: true,
      isCheckboxVisible: false,
      isActionsColumnVisible: true,
    },
  }

Tests:

Ramda
var obj = R.mergeDeepRight(obj1)({ columnDefs: { companyRegistrationNo: {}, fullName: {}, shortName: {}, vatNo: {}, ncage: {} }, defaultColumns: [ 'fullName', 'shortName', 'companyRegistrationNo', 'vatNo', 'ncage', ], gridOptions: { defaultColDef: { resizable: true, sortable: true, }, headerHeight: 40, suppressDragLeaveHidesColumns: true, suppressHorizontalScroll: true, suppressNoRowsOverlay: true, suppressRowClickSelection: true, suppressScrollOnNewData: true, rowSelection: 'multiple', rowHeight: 40, }, customParams: { isCheckboxVisible: false, isActionsColumnVisible: false, pagination: true, translationModule: 'MODULE_ORGANIZATIONS_CIVIL', }, });
Native
var obj = {...obj1, columnDefs: { companyRegistrationNo: {}, fullName: {}, shortName: {}, vatNo: {}, ncage: {} }, defaultColumns: [ 'fullName', 'shortName', 'companyRegistrationNo', 'vatNo', 'ncage', ], gridOptions: { defaultColDef: { resizable: true, sortable: true, }, headerHeight: 40, suppressDragLeaveHidesColumns: true, suppressHorizontalScroll: true, suppressNoRowsOverlay: true, suppressRowClickSelection: true, suppressScrollOnNewData: true, rowSelection: 'multiple', rowHeight: 40, }, customParams: { isCheckboxVisible: false, isActionsColumnVisible: false, pagination: true, translationModule: 'MODULE_ORGANIZATIONS_CIVIL', } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Ramda
Native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring the performance of JavaScript microbenchmarks like RAMDA (a functional programming library) versus native code is crucial for optimizing web applications.

**Benchmark Test Case Explanation**

The provided benchmark test case compares the execution speed of two approaches:

1. **RAMDA**: The first approach uses RAMDA, a popular functional programming library, to merge and extend an object `obj1` with another object.
2. **Native**: The second approach uses native JavaScript code to achieve the same result.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the following options:

* Using a functional programming library like RAMDA
* Using native JavaScript code without external libraries

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

**RAMDA:**

Pros:

* Higher-level abstraction, making it easier to write concise and readable code
* Provides built-in support for functional programming concepts like immutability and recursion
* Community-driven development and extensive documentation

Cons:

* Additional overhead due to the library's runtime execution
* May introduce additional dependencies and potential security risks if not used carefully

**Native:**

Pros:

* Native performance benefits, as the code is executed directly by the JavaScript engine without any library overhead
* No additional dependencies or potential security risks
* Can be more efficient for complex computations

Cons:

* Requires lower-level programming skills and may result in more verbose code
* Less readable and maintainable due to the absence of high-level abstractions

**Library: RAMDA**

RAMDA is a functional programming library that provides a concise and expressive API for common data manipulation tasks. It's designed to be easy to use and integrate into existing JavaScript applications.

The provided benchmark script uses RAMDA's `R.mergeDeepRight` function to merge the `obj1` object with another object, resulting in a new object with combined properties. This approach takes advantage of functional programming principles like immutability and recursion to simplify the code and improve readability.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

The benchmark script does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as ES6 classes, async/await, or modern web APIs. However, it relies on ECMAScript 2015+ syntax, which is supported by most modern browsers.

**Alternative Approaches**

Other alternatives for this benchmark could be:

* Using a different functional programming library like Lodash or Underscore.js
* Comparing with other JavaScript frameworks or libraries that provide data manipulation capabilities, such as React or Angular
* Exploring the performance of other languages or engines, like Node.js or V8

By considering these alternative approaches, developers can gain a deeper understanding of their options and make informed decisions about which approach best suits their project's requirements.

Related benchmarks:

RAMDAvsNATIVE (version: 0)

nic

Comparing performance of: Ramda vs Native

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Ramda

Native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):