Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary operator vs boolean
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary vs boolean
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
this.number = Math.random() * 1000;
Tests:
Math.max/min
return Math.max(250, Math.min(750, this.number));
if
var number = this.number; if(number < 250) return 250; if(number > 750) return 750; return number;
ternary
var number = this.number; return number < 250 ? 250 : (number > 750 ? 750 : number);
boolean
var number = this.number; return ((number < 250) * 250) || ((number > 750) * 750) || number;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Math.max/min
if
ternary
boolean
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered in each test case. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by the `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`. The `Script Preparation Code` initializes a variable `this.number` with a random value between 0 and 1000. There's no HTML preparation code provided, which means that the test will run on an empty webpage. **Test Cases** There are four individual test cases: 1. **Math.max/min**: This test case uses the built-in `Math.max` and `Math.min` functions to find the maximum or minimum value between 250 and 750 based on the generated random number. 2. **if**: This test case uses a traditional if-else statement to check the condition and return either 250, 750, or the original number. 3. **ternary**: This test case uses a ternary operator to perform the same operation as the `if` statement, but in a more concise way. 4. **boolean**: This test case uses the logical OR operator (`||`) with the boolean values of conditions to achieve the same result. **Comparison** The test cases are comparing the performance of different approaches: * `Math.max/min`: The built-in functions * `if`: Traditional if-else statement * `ternary`: Ternary operator * `boolean`: Logical OR operator with boolean values **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief overview of each approach: * **`Math.max/min`**: Built-in functions are usually optimized for performance, making them a good choice. However, they might be less flexible. * **`if`**: A traditional if-else statement can be more readable but may incur overhead due to branching and function calls. * **`ternary`**: The ternary operator is concise and easy to read but might not be as efficient as the built-in functions or `if` statement. * **`boolean`**: Using logical operators with boolean values is an interesting approach, but it may be less readable and harder to understand. **Libraries and Special JS Features** There are no libraries mentioned in the provided benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript features like `let` and `const` (introduced in ECMAScript 2015) have improved the syntax and readability of code. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to test alternative approaches, you could consider: * Using a different operator (e.g., `&&`, `||`) * Implementing custom functions instead of built-in functions * Using loops or recursion for more complex logic * Comparing performance with other programming languages These alternatives would require significant changes to the benchmark definition and test cases.
Related benchmarks:
simple Math.max vs ternary
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary operator 232323
Math.Max() vs Ternary
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary operatorsd
Math.min vs if/else vs ternary operator test 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?