Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
jQuery addClass vs classList.add (manipulated jquery) 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
jQuery addClass vs Javascript classList.add
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.4.1.slim.min.js"></script> <div id="el"></div>
Script Preparation code:
document.getElementById("el").classList.remove("test");
Tests:
jQuery addClass
$("#el").addClass("test");
Javascript classList.add
document.getElementById("el").classList.add("test");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
jQuery addClass
Javascript classList.add
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: jQuery's `addClass` method and the native JavaScript `classList.add` method. The test is designed to manipulate an HTML element (`<div id="el">`) by removing a class (`"test"`), and then adding a new class using each of the two methods. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the following options: 1. **jQuery's `addClass`**: This method adds a CSS class to an element, similar to `classList.add` in native JavaScript. 2. **Native JavaScript `classList.add`**: This method also adds a CSS class to an element, but without the additional overhead of jQuery. **Pros and Cons** **jQuery's `addClass`:** Pros: * Easier to use for developers familiar with jQuery * Can provide more flexibility in styling and layout Cons: * Adds extra overhead due to jQuery's library size and complexity * May introduce performance issues if not optimized correctly **Native JavaScript `classList.add`:** Pros: * Faster execution speed due to its native implementation * More lightweight and efficient compared to jQuery Cons: * Requires more knowledge of modern web development standards (e.g., CSS classes) **Other Considerations** The benchmark also considers the device platform, operating system, and browser version. This is likely done to ensure that the results are representative of a wide range of user environments. **Library: jQuery** jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation and event handling. In this case, it's used to provide the `addClass` method for adding CSS classes to an element. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** None mentioned in this specific benchmark, but MeasureThat.net often tests modern JavaScript features like async/await, Promises, or Web APIs (e.g., Web Storage, Web Workers). **Alternatives** Other alternatives to measure the performance of adding a CSS class include: 1. Vanilla JavaScript with `style.addAttribute()`: This method adds a CSS attribute to an element directly. 2. Using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js, which provide their own implementation of `addClass` or similar functionality. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as widely supported as jQuery's `addClass`, and may require more knowledge of modern web development standards.
Related benchmarks:
jQuery addClass vs classList.add (manipulated jquery)
jQuery removeClass vs classList.remove
jQuery addClass vs jQuery classList.add
jQuery removeClass vs jQuery classList.remove
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?