Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
jQuery addClass vs classList.add (manipulated jquery)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
jQuery addClass vs Javascript classList.add
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://mikailcolak.com/jquery.js"></script> <div id="el"></div>
Script Preparation code:
document.getElementById("el").classList.remove("test");
Tests:
jQuery addClass
$("#el").addClass("test");
Javascript classList.add
document.getElementById("el").classList.add("test");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
jQuery addClass
Javascript classList.add
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what is being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to add an element class: 1. `jQuery addClass`: Using the jQuery library, which is a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation. 2. `javascript classList.add`: A native JavaScript method that allows you to add classes to elements without relying on libraries like jQuery. **Options Compared** The benchmark tests two options: A) `jQuery addClass` with a manipulated jQuery instance (i.e., the jQuery library has been modified to behave differently than its standard behavior). B) `javascript classList.add` **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **jQuery addClass**: * Pros: Easy to use, widely supported, and well-maintained. * Cons: Adds an extra dependency (the jQuery library), which can increase bundle size and complexity. 2. **javascript classList.add**: * Pros: Native support in modern browsers, smaller bundle size, and more efficient. * Cons: May require additional setup or polyfills for older browsers. **Library: jQuery** jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation, event handling, and other tasks. In this benchmark, the `jQuery addClass` option uses a manipulated instance of the library to compare its performance with the native `javascript classList.add` method. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's worth noting that the use of the `classList` property and the `add()` method is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Other Alternatives** If you need to add classes to elements without using jQuery, other alternatives include: 1. **Vanilla JavaScript**: Using the `setAttribute()` method with the `class` attribute or the `classList.add()` method. 2. **Lodash**: A popular utility library that provides a `classList.add()` function as part of its API. 3. **React**: A popular React library provides its own way of adding classes to components using the `className` prop. Keep in mind that each approach has its pros and cons, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.
Related benchmarks:
jQuery addClass vs classList.add
jQuery removeClass vs classList.remove
jQuery addClass vs jQuery classList.add
jQuery removeClass vs jQuery classList.remove
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?