Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
date formatter librariess
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
moment/moment vs moment/luxon
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/moment@2.24.0/moment.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.22.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.__date__ = new Date(); window.__expected__ = '2000/01/06';
Tests:
moment/moment
var actual = moment(__date__).format('YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
moment/luxon
var actual = luxon.DateTime.fromJSDate(__date__).toFormat('yyyy/MM/dd'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
moment/moment
moment/luxon
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of different approaches. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two date formatting libraries: Moment.js and Luxon.js. The test measures how fast each library can format a date string from JavaScript Date object (`__date__`) into a specific format (`YYYY/MM/DD`). **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code sets up two variables: * `window.__date__`: assigns the current JavaScript Date object to a global variable. * `window.__expected__`: defines the expected formatted date string as `'2000/01/06'`. This code ensures that both libraries are testing the same input data. **HTML Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code includes two external scripts: 1. Moment.js (`moment.min.js`) 2. Luxon.js (`luxon.min.js`) These scripts are loaded from CDN repositories, which means the benchmark is testing the performance of these libraries in a browser environment. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: ### 1. `moment/moment` ```javascript var actual = moment(__date__).format('YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__); ``` * This code uses Moment.js to format the date string. * The `format` method is called with a template string (`'YYYY/MM/DD'`) that defines the desired output format. ### 2. `moment/luxon` ```javascript var actual = luxon.DateTime.fromJSDate(__date__).toFormat('yyyy/MM/dd'); console.assert(actual === __expected__); ``` * This code uses Luxon.js to format the date string. * The `fromJSDate` method is called with the JavaScript Date object (`__date__`) as input, and then the `toFormat` method is used to convert it into a string in the desired output format (`'yyyy/MM/dd'`). **Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show two tests: 1. `moment/moment`: executed approximately 24298 times per second. 2. `moment/luxon`: executed approximately 22347 times per second. These results indicate that Moment.js performs slightly better than Luxon.js in this specific test. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** * **Moment.js**: Pros: + Wide adoption and community support + Large number of features and plugins available + Well-documented and easy to use * Cons: + Can be slower due to its complexity + Has a larger footprint (due to its extensive feature set) * Luxon.js: Pros: + Designed specifically for date and time manipulation + Faster execution times compared to Moment.js + Smaller footprint (less overhead) * Cons: + Smaller community and fewer plugins available + Less widely adopted than Moment.js **Other Alternatives** Some other date formatting libraries worth mentioning include: 1. Date-Fns: A lightweight, modern library for working with dates in JavaScript. 2. js-joda: A Java-based library that provides a rich set of date and time calculations. 3. dayjs: A fast and feature-rich date library that is gaining popularity. Keep in mind that the choice of library ultimately depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.
Related benchmarks:
date formatter libraries
date formatter libraries -tiny
date format
date formatter libraries test
luxon vs datefns adding
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?