Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
date formatter libraries test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
3846masa/fdate vs moment/moment vs moment/luxon vs taylorhakes/fecha vs date-fns/date-fns vs xx45/dayjs
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.1/moment.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.2.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/fecha/2.3.3/fecha.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/1.29.0/date_fns.min.js"></script> <script src="https://unpkg.com/dayjs"></script> <script src="https://wzrd.in/standalone/dateformat@latest"></script> <script src="https://wzrd.in/standalone/time-stamp@latest"></script> <script src="https://unpkg.com/fdate"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.__date__ = new Date(); window.__expected__ = '2000/01/06';
Tests:
3846masa/fdate
var actual = fdate`${'YYYY'}/${'MM'}/${'DD'}`(__date__); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
moment/moment
var actual = moment(__date__).format('YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
moment/luxon
var actual = luxon.DateTime.fromJSDate(__date__).toFormat('yyyy/MM/dd'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
taylorhakes/fecha
var actual = fecha.format(__date__, 'YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
date-fns/date-fns
var actual = dateFns.format(__date__, 'YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
xx45/dayjs
var actual = dayjs(__date__).format('YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (6)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
3846masa/fdate
moment/moment
moment/luxon
taylorhakes/fecha
date-fns/date-fns
xx45/dayjs
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **What is being tested?** The tests are comparing different JavaScript libraries for date formatting: 1. `fdate` (now known as `date-fns`) - formats dates using a simple syntax. 2. `moment.js` - a popular library for working with dates and times, providing a wide range of features. 3. `luxon` - a modern, lightweight alternative to moment.js, designed for high performance and ease of use. 4. `fecha` (also known as `taylorhakes/fecha`) - another date formatting library. 5. `dayjs` - a simple and fast library for working with dates. **Options compared** The tests are comparing the execution speed of each library when formatting a specific date string using different syntaxes. * In the case of `fdate`, the syntax used is `${'YYYY'}/${'MM'}/${'DD'}`. * For `moment.js`, the syntax used is `format('YYYY/MM/DD')`. * `Luxon` uses the `toFormat` method with a format string (`yyyy/MM/dd`). * `fecha` uses the `format` method with a format string (`YYYY/MM/DD`). * `dayjs` uses the `format` method with a format string (`YYYY/MM/DD`). **Pros and cons of each approach** 1. **fdate (now date-fns)**: Pros - simple syntax, fast execution. Cons - limited features compared to other libraries. 2. **moment.js**: Pros - widely adopted, feature-rich, well-maintained. Cons - slower performance compared to newer alternatives. 3. **Luxon**: Pros - modern design, high performance, easy to use. Cons - relatively new library, some users may not be familiar with it. 4. **fecha**: Pros - simple syntax, fast execution. Cons - limited features compared to other libraries, and its author is no longer actively maintaining the project. 5. **dayjs**: Pros - simple syntax, fast execution. Cons - relatively new library, some users may not be familiar with it. **Other considerations** * The `fdate` library has been deprecated in favor of `date-fns`, which is a more feature-rich and widely adopted alternative. * Moment.js has a large community and ecosystem around it, but its performance can be slower than newer alternatives like Luxon and dayjs. * Luxon and dayjs are both designed to be fast and easy to use, making them suitable for high-performance applications. **Alternative libraries** If you're looking for alternative date formatting libraries, some options include: * `date-fns`: a modern, feature-rich library that builds upon the `fdate` syntax. * `ms-dateformat`: a lightweight library that provides a simple and easy-to-use API for date formatting. * `dateutil`: a comprehensive library for working with dates and times in JavaScript. Keep in mind that each library has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of which one to use will depend on your specific requirements and preferences.
Related benchmarks:
date formatter libraries
date formatter libraries -tiny
date formatter libraries 2021-01-31
DateTime vs Date
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?