Benchmark: slice vs substring

Script Preparation code:

var example = 'there is no spoon'

Tests:

slice
var result = example.slice(0, 5)
substring
var result = example.substring(0, 5)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
slice
substring

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition:**

The benchmark compares three JavaScript methods: `slice()`, `substr()`, and `substring()`. The focus is on comparing these methods when only a start index is specified. In other words, we're looking at how each method performs when given a substring starting from a specific index.

**Options Compared:**

1.  **Slice():** The `slice()` method returns a shallow copy of a portion of an array. When used with two arguments (start and end), it extracts a subset of the original array.
2.  **Substr():** The `substr()` method extracts a section of a string. It's similar to `slice()`, but it only works on strings, not arrays.
3.  **Substring():** This is a built-in JavaScript function that returns a portion of a string. While it has more features than `substr()`, the focus here is on comparing its performance when used with only a start index.

**Pros and Cons:**

*   **Slice()**: Pros: generally fast, efficient, and widely supported in both arrays and strings (through `slice()` method). Cons: Not as intuitive or familiar to developers compared to other methods.
*   **Substr():** Pros: very lightweight and simple. Cons: Only works on strings, not arrays, which can lead to performance inconsistencies when used with arrays.
*   **Substring():** Pros: highly intuitive function for extracting substrings. Cons: This is a built-in method and using it may be considered "overkill" in non-string-related use cases.

**Library Usage:**

None of the test cases use any external libraries, which means that their performance should be comparable across different browsers and platforms.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax:**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested here. The focus is purely on comparing the performance of three built-in methods for extracting substrings.

**Other Alternatives:**

When working with arrays:

*   `Array.prototype.slice()`
*   `Array.prototype.subarray()` (not commonly used but available)
*   Custom implementation using loops

When working with strings:

*   String.prototype.substr()
*   String.prototype.substring()

Keep in mind that the choice of method depends on the specific use case. For arrays, `slice()` is often a better choice for its flexibility and efficiency. When working directly with strings, `substr()` or `substring()` can be used based on their simplicity and built-in support.

In this benchmark, we're comparing the performance of these methods under controlled conditions to provide insights into how they might behave in different scenarios, but it's always good practice to consider the specific needs of your project when deciding which method to use.

Related benchmarks:

slice vs substring (version: 0)

Compares slice, substr and substring to each other when there is only a start index

Comparing performance of: slice vs substring

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

slice

substring

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):