Benchmark: JQuery version speed test / new

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.3/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script>
  var $jq1124 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.0.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div>
  <ul id="menu">
    <li class="menu-item">1</li>
    <li class="menu-item">2</li>
    <li class="menu-item">3</li>
    <li class="menu-item">4</li>  
  </ul>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
    $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({
      "background-color": "red"
    }).parent().css({
      "border": "1px solid blue"
    }).append($("<p></p>").text("Text.").css({
      "background-color": "green"
    })).end().end().remove();
  console.log('tests' + $);
}

Tests:

$jq1124
tests($jq1124);
$jq224
tests($jq224);
$jq331
tests($jq331);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
$jq1124
$jq224
$jq331

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested in this benchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

The test measures the performance of three different versions of jQuery (1.8.3, 2.0.1, and 3.3.1) when used with the `$.noConflict(true)` method. The test is run in a browser environment on a desktop device running Windows 10.

**Options Compared**

The options being compared are:

1. **jQuery version**: Each test case uses a different version of jQuery: 1.8.3, 2.0.1, and 3.3.1.
2. **$.noConflict(true) method**: The `$.noConflict(true)` method is used to disable conflicts with other libraries, but its performance impact is not the focus of this benchmark.

**Pros and Cons**

The pros and cons of using different versions of jQuery are:

* **jQuery 1.8.3**: This version is older and might have better performance for certain tasks due to its smaller size and more optimized code.
* **jQuery 2.0.1**: This version has some minor improvements over the previous one, but it's not significantly faster or slower than the others.
* **jQuery 3.3.1**: This version is newer and might have better performance for modern web applications due to its improved caching mechanisms and more efficient event handling.

However, the actual performance difference between these versions may be negligible, and other factors like the specific use case, hardware, and browser optimization might have a greater impact on performance.

**Library Use**

The `$.noConflict(true)` method is used by jQuery 2.0.1 and 3.3.1 to disable conflicts with other libraries. This method allows these versions of jQuery to run alongside other libraries that use the `$` alias, without potential conflicts or overwriting each other's functionality.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark.

**Other Considerations**

When choosing a version of jQuery for a project, it's essential to consider factors like:

* **Compatibility**: The version you choose should be compatible with your target browsers and versions.
* **Size and complexity**: Newer versions of jQuery might have smaller sizes due to optimized code, but older versions might still offer better performance for certain tasks.
* **Browser support**: Ensure that the chosen version is supported by your target browsers.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives to testing JavaScript performance include:

* **Benchmarks like Math.js**, which tests performance in various arithmetic operations.
* **Tests involving web workers**, which can be used to test performance in parallel execution.
* **Benchmarking frameworks like BenchmarkJS**, which provides a more structured approach to benchmarking JavaScript code.

Keep in mind that the specific choice of benchmark will depend on your project's requirements and goals.

Related benchmarks:

JQuery version speed test / new (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: $jq1124 vs $jq224 vs $jq331

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

$jq1124

$jq224

$jq331

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):