Benchmark: JQuery Speed Testttxv

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.7.1/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script>
  var $jq1124 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.7.1.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.7.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div>
  <ul id="menu">
    <li class="menu-item">1</li>
    <li class="menu-item">2</li>
    <li class="menu-item">3</li>
    <li class="menu-item">4</li>  
  </ul>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
    $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({
      "background-color": "red"
    }).parent().css({
      "border": "1px solid blue"
    }).end().end().remove();
}

Tests:

$jq1124
tests($jq1124);
$jq224
tests($jq224);
$jq331
tests($jq331);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
$jq1124
$jq224
$jq331

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring JavaScript performance is a crucial task, and MeasureThat.net provides a valuable platform for doing so.

The provided benchmark definition JSON represents a test case that uses jQuery, a popular JavaScript library. The script preparation code defines a function `tests($) { ... }` that takes the jQuery object as an argument. This function performs a series of operations on an HTML element:

1. It selects the `.menu-item` element at index 2 using `$`.
2. It sets the `background-color` property to "red" on the closest ancestor (`ul`) using `css()`.
3. It sets the `border` property to "1px solid blue" on the parent element using `css()`.
4. It removes all elements from the DOM using `remove()`.

The HTML preparation code includes multiple instances of jQuery, which is likely used for versioning and compatibility purposes. The script tags load different versions of jQuery, including:

* `$jq1124`: jQuery 3.7.1 with `.noConflict(true)` called
* `$jq224`: Another instance of jQuery 3.7.1 with `.noConflict(true)` called
* `$jq331`: Yet another instance of jQuery 3.7.1 with `.noConflict(true)` called

These instances are used in the individual test cases to measure their performance.

Now, let's discuss the options compared and their pros and cons:

**Option 1: Using a single instance of jQuery**

Pros:

* Simplifies the benchmarking process
* Reduces overhead due to multiple versions and versions with `.noConflict()`

Cons:

* May not accurately represent real-world scenarios where multiple instances are used

**Option 2: Using multiple instances of jQuery**

Pros:

* Accurately represents real-world scenarios
* Allows for comparison between different versions and configurations

Cons:

* Increases overhead due to versioning and compatibility considerations

In this benchmark, using multiple instances of jQuery ( `$jq1124`, `$jq224`, and `$jq331`) allows for a more accurate representation of real-world scenarios. However, it also increases the complexity and overhead of the benchmark.

Other alternatives considered in benchmarking JavaScript performance include:

1. **Using a different JavaScript engine**: Some benchmarks use multiple engines like V8 (Google), SpiderMonkey (Mozilla), or Chakra (Microsoft) to compare their performance.
2. **Including additional libraries or frameworks**: Some benchmarks may include other libraries or frameworks, such as React or Angular, to measure their impact on performance.
3. **Using a different HTML structure or layout**: Some benchmarks may use varying HTML structures or layouts to test the performance of different JavaScript libraries or engines.
4. **Measuring memory allocation and garbage collection**: Some benchmarks focus on measuring the performance of memory allocation and garbage collection in different JavaScript engines.

In this specific benchmark, MeasureThat.net focuses on measuring the performance of individual instances of jQuery, allowing users to compare their performance across different versions and configurations.

Related benchmarks:

JQuery Speed Testttxv (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: $jq1124 vs $jq224 vs $jq331

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

$jq1124

$jq224

$jq331

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):