Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
sortBy performance
(version: 0)
lodash vs javascript
Comparing performance of:
lodash vs javascript
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script>https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.core.js</script>
Script Preparation code:
var data = [{age: 10}, {age: 20}, {age: 40}, {age:40}];
Tests:
lodash
_.sortBy(data, 'age');
javascript
const sortBy = (key) => { return (a, b) => (a[key] > b[key]) ? 1 : (b[key] > a[key] ? -1 : 0); }; console.log(sortBy(data, 'age'));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash
javascript
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: using Lodash, a popular JavaScript library, versus writing a custom implementation in vanilla JavaScript. **Options Being Compared** 1. **Lodash**: A widely-used JavaScript utility library that provides a set of functions for tasks such as data manipulation, string manipulation, and more. In this benchmark, Lodash is used to sort an array of objects based on the "age" key. 2. **Vanilla JavaScript**: The custom implementation provided in the `Benchmark Definition` code. This approach uses a simple comparison function to determine the order of the objects. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Lodash**: * Pros: Well-tested, widely adopted, and provides a convenient way to perform common tasks. * Cons: Adds an extra dependency, which may not be desirable for all use cases. 2. **Vanilla JavaScript**: * Pros: No dependencies, highly customizable, and can be optimized for specific use cases. * Cons: Requires more code and mental effort to implement correctly. **Library Used** In the benchmark, Lodash is used in a specific way: 1. The `_.sortBy()` function is imported from the Lodash library using the `https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.core.js` script tag. 2. The `data` array is passed to the `_sortBy()` function along with the `age` key as the sorting criteria. **Special JavaScript Features or Syntax** None of the benchmark code uses any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's normally available in modern browsers. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to write a custom sort function similar to the vanilla JavaScript implementation, you could use other libraries like: 1. **FastSort**: A fast and efficient sorting algorithm implemented in JavaScript. 2. **Ramda**: Another popular utility library that provides functional programming utilities, including sorting functions. Keep in mind that these alternatives would require additional dependencies and might not offer significant performance benefits over the vanilla JavaScript implementation. In summary, the benchmark compares the performance of using Lodash for sorting data versus writing a custom implementation in vanilla JavaScript. The choice between these approaches depends on your specific use case, personal preference, and priorities (e.g., convenience vs. customization).
Related benchmarks:
sortBy performance1
sortBy performance2
lodash vs es6 in sort method
order desc with lodash orderBy vs es6 sort method
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?