Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
_.toPairs vs Object.entires
(version: 0)
Comparing lodash toPairs with native JS Object.entires
Comparing performance of:
lodash vs native
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var hashmap = { id1: { id: 'id1', content: '' }, id2: { id: 'id2', content: '' }, id3: { id: 'id3', content: '' } };
Tests:
lodash
_.toPairs(hashmap)
native
Object.entries(hashmap)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash
native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
9 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/138.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 138 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
lodash
19149646.0 Ops/sec
native
48004204.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark compares two ways to iterate over an object: Lodash's `_.toPairs` method and native JavaScript's `Object.entries` method. **Options Compared** * **Lodash's _.toPairs**: This method returns an array of key-value pairs in the object. It uses a for...in loop under the hood. * **Native JavaScript's Object.entries**: This method also returns an array of key-value pairs in the object, but it does so using the new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Pros and Cons** * **Lodash's _.toPairs**: Pros: + Wide compatibility with older browsers and Node.js versions. + Can be used as a utility function for converting objects to iterables. Cons: + Slower than native JavaScript due to the use of a for...in loop. + Additional dependency on Lodash library. * **Native JavaScript's Object.entries**: Pros: + Faster execution speed, especially in modern browsers and Node.js versions. + Part of the standard language, so no additional dependencies are needed. Cons: + Limited compatibility with older browsers and Node.js versions. + Introduced new syntax that might require changes to existing code. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides various utility functions for tasks like array manipulation, object transformation, and more. In this benchmark, it's used for the `_.toPairs` method, which helps convert objects to iterables. **Special JS Feature/Syntax: ES6 New Syntax** The native JavaScript code uses the new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) for accessing object properties by name using bracket notation (`Object.entries(hashmap)`). This is a newer way of doing things compared to older methods like `for...in` or `Object.keys()`. **Other Alternatives** If you don't have access to the Lodash library or prefer not to use it, you can also consider other ways to convert objects to iterables in JavaScript: * Using `Object.keys()` and then iterating over an array of keys. * Using `for...in` loops with object iteration. * Creating a custom function for converting objects to iterables. However, these alternatives might be slower or less efficient than using native JavaScript's `Object.entries`, depending on the specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
isEmpty vs Object.keys
Array.prototype.map vs Lodash.map on large data
lodash _.map vs native map
lodash _.map vs native map true version
native map vs lodash map on large array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?