Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
native map vs lodash map on large array
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
native vs lodash
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var largeArray = new Array(10000).fill(0);
Tests:
native
largeArray.map(x => x + 1);
lodash
_.map(largeArray, x => x + 1);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
native
lodash
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **What's being tested:** The benchmark is comparing two approaches to mapping over an array: 1. **Native JavaScript Map**: This approach uses the built-in `map()` method provided by the JavaScript language, which is native to most browsers. 2. **Lodash Map**: This approach uses a function from the Lodash library, which provides a more flexible and expressive way of mapping over arrays. **Options compared:** The two options being compared are: * Native JavaScript Map (using `map()` method) * Lodash Map (using `_.map()` function) **Pros and Cons:** * **Native JavaScript Map:** + Pros: - Faster execution, since it's a native language construct - Typically more efficient memory usage + Cons: - Less flexible and expressive than Lodash Map - May not handle edge cases or special use cases well * **Lodash Map:** + Pros: - More flexible and expressive, with additional functionality like `mapWith`, `mapEach` - Can handle edge cases and special use cases more effectively + Cons: - Typically slower execution, since it involves an extra function call - May consume more memory due to the additional library overhead **Library:** The Lodash library is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks like array manipulation, string manipulation, and functional programming. **Special JS feature or syntax:** There isn't any specific special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. However, the use of `map()` method and `_.map()` function are examples of using higher-order functions (functions that take other functions as arguments) to manipulate data. **Other alternatives:** If you wanted to test alternative approaches to mapping over arrays, some options could include: * Using a custom implementation in JavaScript * Using a different library like Ramda or Underscore.js * Using a different programming paradigm like functional programming with immutable data structures Keep in mind that the specific approach used will depend on the requirements and constraints of your project. In terms of benchmarking, you can consider using tools like Benchmark.js, Jest, or Mocha to write and run benchmarks. These tools provide features like automatic test running, reporting, and visualization to help you understand performance differences between different approaches. It's worth noting that the specific configuration and options used in this benchmark (e.g., array size, browser, device platform) may affect the results and comparisons made between native JavaScript map and Lodash map.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.map vs Lodash map
Array.prototype.map vs Lodash.map on large data
lodash map vs native map (v2)
lodash map vs native map wraig0
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?