Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Test splice
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
splice vs pop
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
splice
function slasher(arr, howMany) { // Return string after the amount chopped off. return arr.slice(howMany); }
pop
function slasher(arr, howMany) { // it doesn't always pay to be first for (var i = 0; i < howMany; i++) { arr.shift(); } return arr; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
splice
pop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is essentially a script that defines a function named `slasher`. This function takes two arguments: an array (`arr`) and a number (`howMany`). The purpose of this function is to manipulate the array by removing or moving elements based on the value of `howMany`. There are two different implementations of the `slasher` function: 1. **`splice`**: This implementation uses the `slice()` method to return a new array that includes only the last `howMany` elements of the original array. 2. **`pop`**: This implementation uses a for loop to shift elements off the end of the array until there are fewer than `howMany` elements left. **Options being compared** The two options being compared in this benchmark are: 1. **`splice`**: This approach is generally faster and more efficient because it avoids creating a new array and instead modifies the original array in place. 2. **`pop`**: This approach can be slower because it involves shifting elements off the end of the array, which requires additional memory allocations and garbage collection. **Pros and Cons** * **`splice`**: + Pros: Faster, more efficient, and avoids creating a new array. + Cons: May not be as intuitive or familiar to developers who are used to traditional array manipulation methods. * **`pop`**: + Pros: Can be useful when working with small arrays or when the `splice()` method is not supported in certain environments. + Cons: Slower and less efficient, especially for large arrays. **Library** There are no libraries mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, if we assume that the script is running in a browser environment, it's likely that some built-in JavaScript methods or functions are being used (e.g., `slice()`). **Special JS feature or syntax** The use of the `var` keyword with the `i` variable in the second implementation (`pop`) might be notable. This is an older syntax for declaring variables in JavaScript, which has since been replaced by `let` and `const`. However, in this specific case, it doesn't seem to have any significant impact on performance. **Other alternatives** If you wanted to modify the `slasher` function to compare different optimization techniques or alternative approaches, here are some ideas: * Use a different data structure, such as an array buffer or a typed array. * Implement a hybrid approach that combines elements of both `splice` and `pop`. * Experiment with different algorithmic optimizations, such as caching or memoization. * Compare the performance of different JavaScript engines or versions. Overall, this benchmark is focused on comparing the performance of two distinct approaches to manipulating arrays in JavaScript. By testing these approaches, developers can gain insights into the trade-offs between efficiency and readability when working with data structures in their code.
Related benchmarks:
splice vs unshift
splice-slice-b
Array length reduce
pop() and push() vs. splice()
Slice - Splice (1)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?