Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
splice-slice-b
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Splice vs Slice
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = new Array(100).fill(null).map((_,i)=>i)
Tests:
Splice
arr.slice(0, 50)
Slice
arr.splice(50, 50)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Splice
Slice
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined as follows: * `arr` is an array created using the script preparation code: `var arr = new Array(100).fill(null).map((_,i)=>i)`. This creates a large array of 100 elements, where each element is set to null. The `map()` function is used to create a new array with the same length as `arr`, but with different values. * There are two benchmark definitions: 1. `arr.slice(0, 50)` - This tests the slicing operation on the `arr` array, where 50 elements are extracted from the beginning of the array. 2. `arr.splice(50, 50)` - This tests the splice operation on the `arr` array, where 50 elements are removed from the middle of the array. **Comparison Options** The benchmark compares two different approaches to manipulate the `arr` array: 1. **Slicing**: The slicing operation (`slice()`) creates a new array with a subset of elements from the original array. This approach is often faster than modifying the original array because it avoids unnecessary operations. 2. **Splicing**: The splice operation (`splice()`) modifies the original array by removing or inserting elements at specific positions. This approach can be slower than slicing because it involves more complex operations. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Slicing**: + Pros: Faster, more efficient, and less memory-intensive. + Cons: Creates a new array object, which can lead to higher memory allocation and deallocation costs. * **Splicing**: + Pros: Modifies the original array in place, which can be more convenient for some use cases. + Cons: Slower due to the complexity of the operation. **Library and Purpose** There is no specific library mentioned in the benchmark definition. The `Array.prototype.slice()` and `Array.prototype.splice()` methods are built-in JavaScript functions that operate on arrays. **Special JS Feature or Syntax (None)** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. **Other Considerations** When comparing these two approaches, consider the following: * If you need to frequently manipulate large datasets, slicing might be a better choice. * If you need to modify the original array and prefer not to create a new one, splicing might be a better option. * If memory allocation and deallocation are critical concerns, slicing might be a better choice due to its more efficient nature. **Alternatives** Some alternative approaches to manipulating arrays in JavaScript include: 1. **Using `Array.from()`**: Instead of using `slice()`, you can use `Array.from()` to create a new array with the desired elements. 2. **Using `Array.prototype.concat()`**: You can concatenate multiple arrays or iterables to achieve similar results as slicing. 3. **Using `for` loops**: If you prefer an imperative approach, you can use `for` loops to iterate over the array and manipulate its elements. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics depending on the specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
Slice vs splice 2 ...
Splice Slice
Splice Slice 80
Replacing array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?