Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread vs Concat JS ES6
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Spread vs Concat
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Spread
const arr1 = [1, 2, 3, 4] const arr2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] const combined = [...arr1, ...arr2]
Concat
const arr1 = [1, 2, 3, 4] const arr2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] const combined = arr1.concat(arr2)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Spread
Concat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark and the different approaches compared. **Benchmark:** Spread vs Concat JS ES6 **What is being tested:** The provided benchmark compares the performance of two ways to concatenate arrays (or iterables) in JavaScript: 1. **Spread operator (`...`)**: Also known as the rest parameter syntax, it allows you to pass a variable number of arguments to a function. 2. **Concatenation method using `Array.prototype.concat()`**: This is a built-in method that concatenates two or more arrays. **Options compared:** * Spread operator (`...`) * Concatenation method using `Array.prototype.concat()` **Pros and Cons:** 1. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: * Pros: + More concise and expressive syntax. + Can handle nested iterables (e.g., arrays of arrays). + Less overhead compared to function calls, which are used in concatenation. * Cons: + May be slower due to the need for a new array object creation. 2. **Concatenation Method using `Array.prototype.concat()`**: * Pros: + Faster execution since it avoids creating a new array object. * Cons: + Less concise syntax, requiring a separate function call or method invocation. **Library/Library purpose:** None **Special JS feature/Syntax:** The benchmark uses the spread operator (`...`), which is a relatively recent addition to JavaScript (ES6). It's designed to make working with iterables more convenient and expressive. **Other alternatives:** * **Array.prototype.push()**: Another way to concatenate arrays by adding elements to the end of an array using `push()`. This approach would not be included in this benchmark since it would likely have similar performance characteristics to the concatenation method. * **For loops or other iteration methods**: Alternative ways to concatenate arrays using loops or other iteration methods. These approaches would also not be included in this benchmark for the same reason. Overall, the spread operator (`...`) is generally preferred over the concatenation method due to its concise syntax and potential performance benefits when handling nested iterables. However, for simple use cases where speed is more critical, the concatenation method might still be a better choice.
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
concat vs spread 1
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (add)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (forked without jQuery)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?