Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (add)
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var other = params.concat([1]);
spread operator
var other = [...params, 1];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Purpose** The primary goal of this benchmark is to compare two approaches for adding an element to an array: `Array.prototype.concat()` and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`). The test aims to determine which method performs better, with a focus on speed and efficiency. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **`Array.prototype.concat()`**: A traditional method of concatenating arrays using the `concat()` function. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: A new feature introduced in ES6 that allows for more concise array creation by spreading elements into a new array. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of each approach: * **`Array.prototype.concat()`**: + Pros: Widely supported, easy to use, and well-documented. + Cons: Can be slower than the spread operator, especially for large arrays. * **Spread Operator (`...`)**: + Pros: More concise, often faster, and more readable. + Cons: Not as widely supported (older browsers), may not work as expected in some cases. **Library and Purpose** In this benchmark, no specific library is used beyond the built-in JavaScript `Array.prototype`. The spread operator's purpose is to allow for a more efficient way of creating new arrays without using `concat()` or other explicit methods. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark utilizes the ES6 spread operator (`...`), which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015. This feature allows for more concise array creation and modification, making it easier to work with arrays in JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in alternative approaches, here are a few options: * **Using `Array.prototype.push()`**: Another way to add elements to an array, which might be faster than `concat()`. * **Using `Array.from()`**: A method that creates a new array from an iterable source, which could potentially offer better performance. * **Using a library like Lodash's `_.compact()`**: A utility function that can help with array manipulation and concatenation. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as efficient or readable as the spread operator, but they can provide different trade-offs depending on your specific use case. I hope this explanation helps you understand what's being tested in this benchmark!
Related benchmarks:
ES6 Array concat vs spread operator
2 6Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator 2
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
`Array.prototype.concat` vs `spread operator`
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?