Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
`Array.prototype.concat` vs `spread operator`
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Name:** `Array.prototype.concat` vs `spread operator` **Description:** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches for merging arrays: the traditional `concat()` method and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared:** 1. **Traditional `concat()` method**: This is a built-in array method that takes another array as an argument and returns a new array containing all elements from both arrays. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: Introduced in ES6, this operator allows you to expand an array by its elements into a new array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Traditional `concat()` method:** * Pros: + Wide support across older browsers + Easy to read and understand for developers familiar with the method * Cons: + Creates a new array, which can lead to performance issues when dealing with large datasets + Can be slower compared to spread operator due to the overhead of function calls 2. **Spread Operator (`...`):** * Pros: + More concise and expressive than traditional `concat()` + Creates a new array, but in a more efficient way (no function call) + Generally faster performance compared to traditional `concat()` * Cons: + Requires support for ES6+ syntax + May not be as readable for developers unfamiliar with the spread operator **Other Considerations:** * The benchmark also considers the use of a specific JavaScript library, but since there is no mention of one being used, we can assume it's a native JavaScript implementation. * There are no special JS features or syntaxes mentioned in this benchmark. **Alternatives:** If you need to compare other array merging approaches, some alternatives include: 1. Using `Array.prototype.reduce()`: This method allows you to iterate over the elements of an array and accumulate them into a new array. 2. Using `Array.prototype.push()`: This method allows you to add one or more elements to the end of an array. 3. Using a custom implementation using loops: For example, using a nested loop structure to iterate over the elements of both arrays. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and trade-offs compared to the spread operator and traditional `concat()` method.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?