Benchmark: JQuery Mobile 1.2.1 Load Speed On Jquery 1.7.2 3-cases

HTML Preparation code:

<head>
    <title>Hello World!</title> 
  	<script src='//code.jquery.com/jquery-1.7.2.min.js'></script>
	<script src='//code.jquery.com/mobile/1.2.1/jquery.mobile-1.2.1.min.js'></script>
 	<link rel="stylesheet" href="//code.jquery.com/mobile/1.2.1/jquery.mobile-1.2.1.min.css" />
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/> 
</head>
<body> 
<div data-role="page">
    <div data-role="header">
        <h1>Curonsys</h1>
    </div>
    <div data-role="content"> 
        <p>Hello world</p>
    </div>
  	<ul id="mylist" data-role="listview" data-inset="true" data-theme="d" data-divider-theme="e" data-count-theme="b">
		<li data-role="list-divider">Divider</li>
		<li><a href="#">Inbox <span class="ui-li-count">12</span></a></li>
		<li><a href="#">Outbox <span class="ui-li-count">0</span></a></li>
		<li><a href="#">Sent <span class="ui-li-count">328</span></a></li>
      	<input type="button" value="http://curonsys.com" id="curo" class="myButton" data-inline="true"/>
    	<input type="button" value="http://naver.com" id="nav" class="myButton" data-inline="true"/>
	</ul>
</div>
</body>

Script Preparation code:

var dirName;
var isRel;
var parseLocation;

Tests:

path
$(document).ready(function() { dirName = $.mobile.path.get($('curo').attr('value')); });
url
$(document).ready(function() { isRel = $.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl($('nav').attr('value')); });
parseLocation
$(document).ready(function() { parseLocation = $.mobile.path.parseLocation(); });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
path
url
parseLocation

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring JavaScript performance is a crucial aspect of web development, and MeasureThat.net provides a valuable platform for comparing the execution speeds of various approaches.

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test created by jinungcho20190628. The test aims to measure the speed of three different functions: `$.mobile.path.get()`, `$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl()`, and `$.mobile.path.parseLocation()`.

These functions are part of the jQuery Mobile library, which is used for developing mobile web applications. Here's a brief explanation of each function:

1. **`$.mobile.path.get()`**: This function takes a URL as an argument and returns the absolute path of that URL.
2. **`$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl()`**: This function checks whether a given URL is relative or not.
3. **`$.mobile.path.parseLocation()`**: This function parses the location object returned by the browser.

Now, let's discuss the options being compared in this benchmark:

**Option 1: Using `$.mobile.path.get()`**

This option uses the `$.mobile.path.get()` function to retrieve the absolute path of a URL. The test case measures the time taken to execute this function on different URLs.

Pros:

* Easy to implement and understand
* Fast execution speed

Cons:

* Only works for absolute URLs
* May not be suitable for relative URLs or URLs with query parameters

**Option 2: Using `$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl()`**

This option uses the `$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl()` function to check whether a given URL is relative or not. The test case measures the time taken to execute this function on different URLs.

Pros:

* Can handle both absolute and relative URLs
* Faster execution speed compared to Option 1

Cons:

* May be slower than Option 1 for certain use cases (e.g., when working with absolute URLs)

**Option 3: Using `$.mobile.path.parseLocation()`**

This option uses the `$.mobile.path.parseLocation()` function to parse the location object returned by the browser. The test case measures the time taken to execute this function on different URLs.

Pros:

* Provides more detailed information about the URL (e.g., scheme, host, path, query)
* Faster execution speed compared to Option 1

Cons:

* May be slower than Option 2 for certain use cases (e.g., when working with relative URLs)

The benchmark results show that `$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl()` is the fastest option, followed closely by `$.mobile.path.parseLocation()`. `$.mobile.path.get()` is the slowest option.

Other alternatives to consider:

* **Native JavaScript implementations**: Some browsers have native functions for manipulating URLs and parsing location objects. For example, in modern browsers, you can use the `URL` API or the `window.location` object to parse URLs.
* **Third-party libraries**: There are other libraries available that provide similar functionality to jQuery Mobile's URL manipulation functions. These libraries might offer better performance or more features than jQuery Mobile.

In conclusion, this benchmark highlights the importance of choosing the right approach for URL manipulation and parsing in your web applications. By understanding the pros and cons of each option, you can make informed decisions about which library or implementation to use in your projects.

Related benchmarks:

JQuery Mobile 1.2.1 Load Speed On Jquery 1.7.2 3-cases (version: 0)

jinungcho20190628

Comparing performance of: path vs url vs parseLocation

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

path

url

parseLocation

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):