Benchmark: JQuery Mobile 1.1.2 Load Speed On Jquery 1.12.4 tes

HTML Preparation code:

<head>
    <title>Hello World!</title> 
  	<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js'></script>
	<script src='//code.jquery.com/mobile/1.1.2/jquery.mobile-1.1.2.min.js'></script>
 	<link rel="stylesheet" href="//code.jquery.com/mobile/1.2.1/jquery.mobile-1.2.1.min.css" />
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/> 
</head>
<body> 
<div data-role="page">
    <div data-role="header">
        <h1>Curonsys</h1>
    </div>
    <div data-role="content"> 
        <p>Hello world</p>
    </div>
  	<ul id="mylist" data-role="listview" data-inset="true" data-theme="d" data-divider-theme="e" data-count-theme="b">
		<li data-role="list-divider">Divider</li>
		<li><a href="#">Inbox <span class="ui-li-count">12</span></a></li>
		<li><a href="#">Outbox <span class="ui-li-count">0</span></a></li>
		<li><a href="#">Sent <span class="ui-li-count">328</span></a></li>
      	<input type="button" value="http://curonsys.com" id="curo" class="myButton" data-inline="true"/>
    	<input type="button" value="http://naver.com" id="nav" class="myButton" data-inline="true"/>
	</ul>
</div>
</body>

Script Preparation code:

var dirName;
var isRel;

Tests:

path
$(document).ready(function() { dirName = $.mobile.path.get($('curo').attr('value')); });
url
$(document).ready(function() { isRel = $.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl($('nav').attr('value')); });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
path
url

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring JavaScript performance is crucial for optimizing code and ensuring a smooth user experience.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents two test cases: `path` and `url`. These test cases evaluate the performance of jQuery Mobile's path manipulation functions (`$.mobile.path.get` and `$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl`) on different inputs. The benchmark measures how many executions per second each function can handle, which is an important metric for performance optimization.

**Options Compared**

The two test cases compare the performance of the following options:

1.  **$.mobile.path.get**: This function retrieves a path from a given element's value attribute.
2.  **$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl**: This function checks whether a URL is relative or not.

The differences between these options are as follows:

*   **$.mobile.path.get**: It returns the absolute URL of an asset, while `$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl` only checks if a URL is relative.
*   **$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl**: It can be used to check if a given URL is relative or not.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons for each option:

*   **$.mobile.path.get**: Pros:

*   Returns the absolute URL of an asset.
    *   Can be useful when working with URLs as input.
    *   Can help ensure that URLs are correctly resolved in the application.

Cons:

*   May incur additional overhead due to parsing the value attribute and resolving the URL.
*   **$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl**: Pros:

*   Fast and lightweight, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
    *   Can be used to check if a given URL is relative or not without incurring significant overhead.

Cons:

*   Only checks whether a URL is relative or not; does not return the absolute URL.

**Library**

In this benchmark, jQuery Mobile's path manipulation functions (`$.mobile.path.get` and `$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl`) are used. These functions are part of the jQuery Mobile library and provide convenient methods for working with URLs and paths in mobile applications.

**Special JavaScript Features or Syntax**

This benchmark does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, Promises, or modern Web API features like `URL` or `Navigator`.

**Alternatives**

If you want to optimize path manipulation functions or URL checking, consider the following alternatives:

1.  **Native URL parsing**: Instead of using jQuery Mobile's path manipulation functions, you can use native URL parsing methods (e.g., `URL`, `Navigator`) for more efficient and lightweight solutions.
2.  **Custom implementation**: If performance is a top priority, you may want to implement your own custom function for path manipulation or URL checking, which would allow you to fine-tune the optimization process according to your specific use case.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might require additional code and potentially more development time, but they can provide better performance characteristics and more control over the optimization process.

Related benchmarks:

JQuery Mobile 1.1.2 Load Speed On Jquery 1.12.4 tes (version: 0)

jinungcho20190628

Comparing performance of: path vs url

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

path

url

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):