Benchmark: Jquery-Mobile-Load-Speed-Test

HTML Preparation code:

<head>
    <title>Hello World!</title> 
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/> 
    <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
</head>
<body> 
<div data-role="page">
    <div data-role="header">
        <h1>Curonsys</h1>
    </div>
    <div data-role="content"> 
        <p>Hello world</p>
    </div>
</div>
</body>

Script Preparation code:

function loadScript(url, callback) {
	var script = document.createElement('script');
	script.src = url;
	script.onload = callback;
	document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(script);
}
var loaded = function() {
	document.write(str);
}

Tests:

v145
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.4.5/jquery.mobile-1.4.5.min.js', loaded);
v132
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.3.2/jquery.mobile-1.3.2.min.js', loaded);
v112
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.1.2/jquery.mobile-1.1.2.min.js', loaded);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
v145
v132
v112

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is defined in JSON format, which represents a JavaScript microbenchmark. The `Script Preparation Code` section contains a custom function called `loadScript`, which loads an external script at a specified URL and executes it when loaded. In this case, the script being loaded is a jQuery Mobile library.

The `Html Preparation Code` section defines an HTML page that includes the jQuery Mobile library, as well as some basic structure for the test page.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are three individual test cases defined:

1. "v145" - loads the version 1.4.5 of the jQuery Mobile library
2. "v132" - loads the version 1.3.2 of the jQuery Mobile library
3. "v112" - loads the version 1.1.2 of the jQuery Mobile library

Each test case has a unique `Benchmark Definition` that defines the script to be loaded and executed.

**Options Compared**

The options being compared in this benchmark are:

* Different versions of the jQuery Mobile library (1.4.5, 1.3.2, and 1.1.2)

These different versions are likely being compared to see which one has the best performance characteristics.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

Using a different version of the same library can have pros and cons:

* **Pros:**
	+ Can help identify performance regressions in newer versions
	+ Allows for comparison between older and newer versions
	+ Can provide insight into how specific libraries evolve over time
* **Cons:**
	+ May not accurately represent real-world use cases, which often involve a range of different versions
	+ Can be influenced by other factors, such as hardware or software configurations

**Library - jQuery Mobile**

jQuery Mobile is an open-source library that provides a touch-friendly interface for web applications. Its purpose is to simplify the development process by providing pre-built components and functionality for mobile devices.

In this benchmark, the jQuery Mobile library is being used to compare its performance across different versions.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax - None**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

Some other alternatives that could be used to test the loading and execution of scripts include:

* Using a different script loader, such as RequireJS or SystemJS
* Comparing the performance of different HTML structures or templates
* Testing the performance of different browser versions or configurations

However, using a custom `loadScript` function with a specific library like jQuery Mobile provides a controlled environment for testing script loading and execution characteristics.

Related benchmarks:

Jquery-Mobile-Load-Speed-Test (version: 0)

jinungcho20190627

Comparing performance of: v145 vs v132 vs v112

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

v145

v132

v112

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):