Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
True vs bitfield
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Bitfield vs True
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Bitfield
const READONLY = 1 << 0; class FileBit { constructor() { this._bitField = 0; } isReadOnly() { // Parentheses are required. return (this._bitField & READONLY) !== 0; } setReadOnly() { this._bitField = this._bitField | READONLY; } unsetReadOnly() { this._bitField = this._bitField & (~READONLY); } } var ft = new FileBit; ft.isReadOnly() === true; ft.setReadOnly(); ft.unsetReadOnly(); ft.isReadOnly() === false;
True
class FileBool { constructor() { this._readonly = false; } isReadOnly() { // Parentheses are required. return this._readonly; } setReadOnly() { this._readonly = true; } unsetReadOnly() { this._readonly = false; } } var fb = new FileBool; fb.isReadOnly() === true; fb.setReadOnly(); fb.unsetReadOnly(); fb.isReadOnly() === false;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Bitfield
True
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Explanation** The provided JSON represents two test cases, each testing different approaches for checking and modifying the read-only status of an object in JavaScript. **True vs Bitfield: Overview** There are two main options being compared: 1. **Bitfield**: This approach uses a bitwise operation to check if a value is set (i.e., non-zero). It defines a constant `READONLY` as 1 followed by 0 (`1 << 0`). The `isReadOnly()` method checks if the `_bitField` property of an object has this bit set. If it does, the object is considered read-only. 2. **True**: This approach uses a simple boolean value `true` or `false` to represent read-only status. The `isReadOnly()` method simply returns the value of `_readonly`, which is initialized as `false`. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Bitfield:** Pros: * Can be more efficient for large numbers of objects, since it only requires a single bitwise operation. * Can be used to check multiple bit fields simultaneously. Cons: * Requires defining a constant value (`READONLY`) that represents the specific bit field being checked. * May be less readable or maintainable for developers who are not familiar with bitwise operations. **True:** Pros: * Easier to understand and use, especially for developers without experience with bitwise operations. * Does not require defining any constants or specialized values. Cons: * May be slower than the bitfield approach for large numbers of objects, since it requires a separate comparison operation. * May lead to more code duplication if multiple boolean properties are used in different contexts. **Library Considerations** Neither of the approaches relies on a specific JavaScript library. However, if you were to implement either approach using a library like jQuery or Lodash, the choice would depend on the specific features and optimizations offered by those libraries. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The benchmarks do not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the use of `const` for declaring constants and template literals for string interpolation. There are no explicit uses of ES6 classes, arrow functions, or other advanced features. **Other Alternatives** If you were looking to compare alternative approaches for checking and modifying read-only status in JavaScript, some possible alternatives could include: * Using a library like `lodash` to implement a more generic, reusable solution. * Implementing a custom solution using a data structure like a trie or a binary search tree. * Comparing different algorithmic approaches, such as using a hash table or a caching mechanism. Keep in mind that the choice of alternative approach would depend on specific requirements and performance considerations.
Related benchmarks:
bitwise operator vs. boolean logic when using TypedArrays
floor() vs trunc() vs bitwise hacks (~~, >> 0, etc) 2
Math.round vs Bitwise
floor vs trunc vs bit shift
toFixed vs toPrecision vs Math.round() vs bitwise, also trunc, floor
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?