Benchmark: Lodash sort - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.11/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data = [
  {
    "name": "Forbes Hayes"
  },
  {
    "name": "Elisabeth Avila"
  },
  {
    "name": "Goodwin Jacobson"
  },
  {
    "name": "Dixie Cummings"
  },
  {
    "name": "Underwood Caldwell"
  },
  {
    "name": "Lewis Flowers"
  },
  {
    "name": "Madeleine Terrell"
  }
]

Tests:

Native
data.sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name))
Lodash
_.sortBy(data, option => option.name)
Native manual compare
data.sort((a, b) => { if(a.name < b.name) return -1; if(a.name > b.name) return 1; return 0; })

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native
Lodash
Native manual compare

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what is being tested in the provided benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition:**

The website provides several individual test cases that compare different approaches to sorting an array of objects. The basic idea is to sort an array of names in alphabetical order using various methods:

1. **Native**: The built-in `sort` method with a custom comparison function.
2. **Lodash**: The `sortBy` method from the Lodash library, which sorts an array based on a provided function.
3. **Native manual compare**: A custom implementation of sorting using if-else statements to compare elements.

**Options Compared:**

The benchmark compares the performance of these three approaches:

* Native: Built-in JavaScript sorting algorithm with a custom comparison function.
* Lodash: The `sortBy` method from the Lodash library, which sorts an array based on a provided function.
* Native manual compare: A custom implementation of sorting using if-else statements to compare elements.

**Pros and Cons:**

1. **Native**: Built-in JavaScript sorting algorithm is fast and efficient. However, it may not be as readable or maintainable as other approaches, especially for complex comparisons.
	* Pros: Fast, easy to implement, and part of the standard library.
	* Cons: May not be as readable or maintainable.
2. **Lodash**: The `sortBy` method provides a convenient and flexible way to sort arrays based on a custom function. However, it introduces an external dependency (the Lodash library) and may have performance overhead due to the additional function call.
	* Pros: Convenient, flexible, and easy to use.
	* Cons: Introduces an external dependency, may have performance overhead.
3. **Native manual compare**: This approach provides complete control over the sorting algorithm but requires more code and maintenance effort.
	* Pros: Provides complete control, no external dependencies.
	* Cons: Requires more code and maintenance effort.

**Library:**

The Lodash library is used in the "Lodash" test case. Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, string manipulation, and object manipulation. In this case, the `sortBy` method is used to sort an array based on a custom function.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing different sorting algorithms and their performance characteristics.

**Alternatives:**

If you're looking for alternative sorting algorithms, some options include:

* **Quicksort**: A fast and efficient sorting algorithm with an average time complexity of O(n log n).
* **Merge sort**: Another efficient sorting algorithm with a time complexity of O(n log n).
* **Heapsort**: A sorting algorithm that uses a heap data structure to sort elements in O(n log n) time.

However, these algorithms may not be as convenient or easy to use as the built-in JavaScript `sort` method or the Lodash `sortBy` method.

Related benchmarks:

Lodash sort (version: 0)

Compare native sorting vs lodash

Comparing performance of: Native vs Lodash vs Native manual compare

Created: 7 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Native

Lodash

Native manual compare

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):