Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
testr 23r2 323r23r
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
performance now vs date now
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
performance now
(performance.timeOrigin) + Math.floor(performance.now())
date now
Date.now();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
performance now
date now
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand the provided JSON benchmark data. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON data represents two individual test cases, each measuring the execution time of a specific JavaScript expression. The first test case measures the execution time of `performance.now()`, while the second test case measures the execution time of `(performance.timeOrigin) + Math.floor(performance.now())`. **Options compared:** Two options are being compared: 1. **`performance.now()`**: This method returns the current time in milliseconds since the Unix epoch (January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC). 2. **`(performance.timeOrigin) + Math.floor(performance.now())`**: This expression calculates the elapsed time by subtracting the `timeOrigin` from the current time. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **`performance.now()`**: * Pros: + Simple to use. + Provides a high-resolution timer. * Cons: + May not be suitable for precise timing due to its resolution (approximately 10-15 milliseconds). 2. **`(performance.timeOrigin) + Math.floor(performance.now())`**: * Pros: + Can provide more accurate results, especially in cases where the `timeOrigin` is used. * Cons: + The expression itself may introduce additional overhead. + Requires understanding of performance timing and its nuances. **Library usage:** Neither test case uses a specific library. However, the use of `performance` and `Math.floor` suggests that JavaScript's built-in functionality is being utilized. **Special JS feature or syntax:** The `performance.now()` method is a special feature in JavaScript that provides high-precision timing capabilities. It was introduced in ECMAScript 5 (ES5) and has since become a standard feature in modern browsers. Other alternatives for testing performance: * Using Web Workers or threads to isolate the performance-critical code. * Utilizing GPU-accelerated timing methods, such as `performance.now()` with WebGL or OpenCL. * Leveraging third-party libraries like Benchmark.js or micro-benchmarking frameworks. Keep in mind that each alternative has its own trade-offs and requirements for implementation.
Related benchmarks:
testtestset
startsWith vs inlcudes
Test UUID with different optimizations
test join1
приведения к числу и строке в или выражении 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?