Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test join1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
join vs array
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
join
const first = 'просветитель'; const second = 'терпеливость'; const firstArr = first.toLowerCase().split('').sort().join(); const secondArr = second.toLowerCase().split('').sort().join(); if (first.length !== second.length) { return false; } return firstArr === secondArr;
array
const first = 'просветитель'; const second = 'терпеливость'; const firstArr = first.toLowerCase().split('').sort(); const secondArr = second.toLowerCase().split('').sort(); if (first.length !== second.length) { return false; } for (let i = 0; i < firstArr.length; i++) { if (firstArr[i] !== secondArr[i]) { return false; } } return true;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
join
array
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net JavaScript microbenchmarks. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents two individual test cases, each with its own benchmark definition in JavaScript. The tests are designed to measure the performance of string joining operations, specifically comparing the results of concatenating two strings using different approaches. **Options compared:** Two options are compared: 1. **`join()` method**: This is a built-in JavaScript method that joins one or more arrays into a single array. 2. **Manual iteration**: In this approach, the test code iterates over each character in the first string and checks if it matches the corresponding character in the second string. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **`join()` method**: * Pros: + Efficient and concise way to join strings. + Built-in functionality reduces development time. * Cons: + May not be optimal for large strings or performance-critical applications. 2. **Manual iteration**: * Pros: + Can provide better control over the joining process, especially when working with complex string formatting requirements. * Cons: + Inefficient and prone to errors due to manual looping and character-by-character comparison. In general, the `join()` method is a good choice for most use cases, while manual iteration might be more suitable for specific, performance-critical applications or when dealing with large strings. **Library usage:** There are no libraries mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that MeasureThat.net uses its own library to handle benchmarking and reporting features. **Special JS feature or syntax:** None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard language constructs.
Related benchmarks:
Join vs Join2
Join vs Join2 part 2
arity 3 string join vs concat vs plus with separator
join vs string + trim vs filter + join
string concat + join vs unshift + join (2)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?