Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JSON.stringify object literals vs class
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
JSON.stringify obj literals vs JSON.stringfy class instance
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
JSON.stringify obj literals
let obj = { name: ['Bob', 'Smith'], age: 32, gender: 'male', interests: ['music', 'skiing'], bio: function () { console.log(this.name[0] + ' ' + this.name[1] + ' is ' + this.age + ' years old. He likes ' + this.interests[0] + ' and ' + this.interests[1] + '.'); }, greeting: function () { console.log('Hi! I\'m ' + this.name[0] + '.'); } }; for (let index = 0; index < 10000; index++) { JSON.stringify(obj); }
JSON.stringfy class instance
class Person { constructor(name, age, gender, interests) { this.name = name; this.age = age; this.gender = gender; this.interests = interests } bio () { console.log(this.name[0] + ' ' + this.name[1] + ' is ' + this.age + ' years old. He likes ' + this.interests[0] + ' and ' + this.interests[1] + '.'); } greeting () { console.log('Hi! I\'m ' + this.name[0] + '.'); } } for (let index = 0; index < 10000; index++) { JSON.stringify(new Person(['Bob', 'Smith'], 32, 'male', ['music', 'skiing'])); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
JSON.stringify obj literals
JSON.stringfy class instance
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a benchmarking test case on MeasureThat.net, which compares the performance of two approaches: converting objects to strings using `JSON.stringify()` with object literals versus converting instances of a custom class (`Person`) to strings. **What is tested?** Two individual test cases are defined: 1. **`JSON.stringify obj literals`**: This test creates an object literal and repeats the process of calling `JSON.stringify()` on it 10,000 times. 2. **`JSON.stringify class instance`**: This test creates an instance of a custom class (`Person`) and repeats the process of calling `JSON.stringify()` on it 10,000 times. **Comparison options** The two approaches being compared are: 1. **Object literals**: Represented by the object literal `let obj = { ... }`. 2. **Custom class instances**: Represented by the custom class `class Person { ... }`. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** **Object literals:** * Pros: + Typically faster, as it doesn't involve creating a new instance. + Less overhead due to the absence of class metadata. * Cons: + May lead to more memory allocation, as each object creation results in a new heap allocation. **Custom class instances:** * Pros: + May be more efficient if the class has a lot of metadata (e.g., constructor arguments), which can be stored in the class's metatable. + Can provide better control over serialization and deserialization processes. * Cons: + Involves creating a new instance, which may introduce additional overhead. + Requires careful handling of constructor arguments and class metadata. **Library:** In both test cases, the `JSON.stringify()` function is used to convert objects to strings. The `JSON` object is part of the ECMAScript Standard Library, which provides methods for working with JSON data. **Special JS feature or syntax:** None mentioned in this specific benchmark, but it's worth noting that some browsers may have additional features or syntaxes related to class instances and serialization (e.g., WebAssembly). **Other alternatives:** If you wanted to explore alternative approaches, here are a few ideas: 1. **JSON.parse()` and `JSON.stringify()` with custom replacer functions**: You could use `JSON.parse()` and `JSON.stringify()` with custom replacer functions to manually control the serialization process. 2. **Utilizing a custom serialization library**: Consider using a dedicated serialization library like `js-yaml` or `json-stream` for more efficient and flexible serialization processes. **Benchmark Preparation Code:** The provided script preparation code is minimal, but it creates an object literal (`obj`) and repeats the process of calling `JSON.stringify()` on it. The custom class instance creation code uses a loop to create 10,000 instances of the `Person` class and calls `JSON.stringify()` on each one. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
json stringify vs object tostring
Object.keys.length vs JSON.stringify 2
json stringify vs String() vs int tostring
json stringify vs string tostring
boolean json stringify vs object tostring
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?