Benchmark: boolean json stringify vs object tostring

Script Preparation code:

function makeTestData() { return false; }

Tests:

toString
makeTestData().toString()
JSON.stringify
JSON.stringify(makeTestData());

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
toString
JSON.stringify

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/129.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 129 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
toString	25182778.0 Ops/sec
JSON.stringify	8514937.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to explain the test cases and options being compared in the MeasureThat.net benchmark.

**Overview of the Benchmark**

The benchmark compares two ways to convert a boolean value to a string: using `toString()` or `JSON.stringify()`. The purpose of this benchmark is to measure which method is faster for small JSON objects, such as a single boolean value.

**Options being Compared**

Two options are being compared:

1. **`makeTestData().toString()`**: This method uses the `toString()` method directly on the boolean value returned by `makeTestData()`. The `toString()` method returns a string representation of the object.
2. **`JSON.stringify(makeTestData())`**: This method uses the `JSON.stringify()` function to convert the boolean value to a string. The `JSON.stringify()` function serializes an object into a JSON string.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **`toString()`**:
	* Pros: lightweight, simple, and widely supported.
	* Cons: may not be suitable for larger objects or complex data structures, as it uses the default string representation of the object, which might not be human-readable or easily parseable.
2. **`JSON.stringify()`**:
	* Pros: allows for more control over the serialization process, can handle complex data structures, and produces a human-readable JSON string.
	* Cons: heavier, more computationally expensive, and may require additional dependencies (e.g., `json-stringify-safe`).

**Library Used**

The benchmark uses the built-in `JSON` object in JavaScript, which provides the `stringify()` function.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the standard `toString()` and `JSON.stringify()` methods.

**Other Alternatives**

Alternative approaches to converting a boolean value to a string might include:

* Using a custom implementation, such as a simple switch statement or lookup table.
* Using a library like `lodash` or `json-stringify-safe` for more control over the serialization process.
* Using a template literal or other string templating mechanisms.

However, these alternatives are not being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of `toString()` and `JSON.stringify()` directly.

Related benchmarks:

boolean json stringify vs object tostring (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: toString vs JSON.stringify

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

toString

JSON.stringify

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):