Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator!!
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches for merging arrays in JavaScript: `Array.prototype.concat()` and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`). The goal is to determine which approach is faster and more efficient. **Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **`Array.prototype.concat`**: This test case uses the traditional `concat()` method to merge an array with another array containing a variable number of elements. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This test case uses the spread operator to merge an array with another array containing a variable number of elements. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: * `Array.prototype.concat()`: A traditional method for merging arrays, which involves creating a new array and adding each element from the first array to the second array. * Spread Operator (`...`): A new syntax introduced in ES6 that allows for more concise merging of arrays. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach: * **`Array.prototype.concat()`**: + Pros: Well-established, widely supported, and easy to use. + Cons: Can be slower than the spread operator due to the overhead of creating a new array. * **Spread Operator (`...`)** + Pros: More concise, faster execution, and more memory-efficient. + Cons: May not work as expected in older browsers or environments that don't support ES6. **Library Used** None. This benchmark doesn't use any external libraries beyond the standard JavaScript library. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a new syntax introduced in ES6, which allows for more concise merging of arrays. It's also used as a rest parameter in function definitions, but that's not relevant to this benchmark. **Benchmark Preparation Code and HTML Preparation Code** The provided `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code` are empty, indicating that no additional setup is required for the benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you were to write your own benchmark, you might consider using other approaches or variations, such as: * Using `Array.prototype.push()` instead of `concat()` * Using `Array.prototype.splice()` instead of `concat()` * Using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js to handle array merging * Testing different array sizes and types (e.g., object arrays) Keep in mind that the benchmark is designed to test specific scenarios, so it's essential to tailor your own benchmarking approach to your specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (add)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?