Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
adsfadsffads
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
adsfadsfads vs sadasadsadsadsadsads
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
adsfadsfads
new Array(30).fill(undefined).map((_, i) => i)
sadasadsadsadsadsads
Array.from(Array.from({length:30}).keys())
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
adsfadsfads
sadasadsadsadsadsads
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros/cons, library usage, special JS features, and other considerations. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net. It consists of two test cases: "adsfadsfads" and "sadasadsadsadsadsads". The benchmark aims to measure the performance of these test cases in different browsers. **Test Cases** 1. **"adsfadsfads"** * Benchmark Definition: `new Array(30).fill(undefined).map((_, i) => i)` * This test case creates an array of 30 elements, fills it with undefined values, and then maps each element to its index (i). 2. **"sadasadsadsadsadsads"** * Benchmark Definition: `Array.from(Array.from({length:30}).keys())` * This test case uses the spread operator to create two arrays of 30 elements. The outer array is created by spreading an object with a length property of 30, and the inner array is created using the `Array.from()` method. **Comparison Options** The benchmark compares the performance of these two test cases in different browsers, specifically Chrome 69 on a Macintosh (Intel Mac OS X 10.13.5) device platform. The results are: | Browser | ExecutionsPerSecond | | --- | --- | | Chrome 69 | 1393534.875 | | Chrome 69 | 105047.8828125 | **Pros and Cons** 1. **"adsfadsfads"`: * Pros: This test case uses a simple mapping function, which is easy to optimize for performance. * Cons: The use of `undefined` as the fill value might lead to slower performance due to the need to check for undefined values during execution. 2. **"sadasadsadsadsadsads"`: * Pros: This test case uses an optimized spread operator, which can provide better performance in some cases. * Cons: The use of nested `Array.from()` calls might lead to slower performance due to the creation of multiple temporary arrays. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage in these benchmark definitions. However, the `Array.from()` method is a built-in JavaScript method that uses a V8 (V8 Engine) implementation under the hood. **Special JS Features** 1. **Spread Operator**: The spread operator (`...`) is a modern JavaScript feature that allows for more concise array creation. It is supported in most browsers and provides better performance than traditional array construction methods. 2. **Map Function**: The `map()` function is another built-in JavaScript method that applies a transformation to each element of an array. **Other Considerations** 1. **Optimization Techniques**: The use of optimization techniques, such as memoization or caching, could potentially improve the performance of these benchmark cases. 2. **Hardware and Software Variability**: The results might vary depending on hardware and software configurations, such as CPU architecture, RAM, and browser extensions. **Alternatives** If you want to create similar benchmarks, consider exploring other alternatives: 1. **Benchmarking Frameworks**: Use established benchmarking frameworks like Benchmark.js or Microbenchmark. 2. **V8 Profiler**: Utilize the V8 profiler in Chrome DevTools to analyze performance bottlenecks in your JavaScript code. 3. **Native Performance Tools**: Leverage native performance tools, such as perf or gprof, for more detailed analysis of CPU and memory usage. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
Precision rounding
demoasd
Math.ceil() vs. 0 bitshift
IndexOf vs Includes in string - larger string edition
Markdown Performance Comparison 113
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?