Benchmark: JQuery version speed test (1.11 vs 2.2.4 vs 3.3.1)

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.0/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script>
  var $jq1124 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div>
  <ul id="menu">
    <li class="menu-item">1</li>
    <li class="menu-item">2</li>
    <li class="menu-item">3</li>
    <li class="menu-item">4</li>  
  </ul>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
    $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({
      "background-color": "red"
    }).parent().css({
      "border": "1px solid blue"
    }).append($("<p></p>").text("Text.")).end().end().remove();
}

Tests:

$jq1124
tests($jq1124);
$jq224
tests($jq224);
$jq331
tests($jq331);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
$jq1124
$jq224
$jq331

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring performance differences in JavaScript can be fascinating, but it's also crucial to understand what's being tested and the implications of those tests.

**What is being tested?**

The provided benchmark measures the execution speed of three different versions of jQuery:

1. **jQuery 1.11**: This version was widely used in older projects and applications.
2. **jQuery 2.2.4**: Released in 2013, this version introduced some improvements and bug fixes.
3. **jQuery 3.3.1**: The latest version available at the time of benchmark creation, which offers various performance enhancements.

**Options being compared**

The test cases compare the execution speed of each jQuery version under different conditions:

*   `tests($jq1124)`: Runs the test using jQuery 1.11.
*   `tests($jq224)`: Runs the test using jQuery 2.2.4.
*   `tests($jq331)`: Runs the test using jQuery 3.3.1.

**Pros and cons of each approach**

Here's a brief analysis of the pros and cons for each:

*   **jQuery 1.11**: Although outdated, this version might still be used in legacy projects or applications. However, it's likely to be slower than newer versions due to its age.
*   **jQuery 2.2.4**: This version is a compromise between performance and compatibility. While not the latest, it offers some improvements over older versions.
*   **jQuery 3.3.1**: As the latest version at the time of benchmark creation, this version likely provides the best balance between performance and features.

**Library and its purpose**

The test utilizes jQuery, a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation and event handling. It's widely used in web development due to its ease of use and extensive community support.

**Special JS feature or syntax (none mentioned)**

There are no notable special features or syntax used in this benchmark.

**Other alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative libraries or methods, consider:

*   **Lodash**: A popular utility library that can simplify DOM manipulation tasks.
*   **Vanilla JavaScript**: Using native JavaScript functions and methods to achieve similar results without relying on external libraries.
*   **Preact**: A lightweight alternative to React that offers a balance between performance and feature set.

When measuring performance differences in JavaScript, keep the following factors in mind:

*   **Browser and device variations**: Results may vary across different browsers and devices due to hardware and software differences.
*   **Network conditions**: Internet connectivity and latency can impact benchmark results.
*   **Test scope and complexity**: The test's focus on a specific aspect of performance might not accurately represent real-world usage patterns.

Remember that benchmarks like this one provide valuable insights into the relative performance characteristics of different libraries or versions, but should be interpreted in context.

Related benchmarks:

JQuery version speed test (1.11 vs 2.2.4 vs 3.3.1) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: $jq1124 vs $jq224 vs $jq331

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

$jq1124

$jq224

$jq331

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):