Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
testtest132123asdasda2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
B vs C
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var getClass = {}.toString, hasProperty = {}.hasOwnProperty, expression = /Kit/g; function Test() {} // Checks the internal [[Class]] name of the object. function isFunctionA(object) { return object && getClass.call(object) == '[object Function]'; } // Partial duck-typing implementation by Garrett Smith. function isFunctionB(object) { return typeof object === 'function' } // Pure duck-typing implementation taken from Underscore.js. function isFunctionC(object) { return !!(object && object.constructor && object.call && object.apply); }
Tests:
B
isFunctionB(Test); isFunctionB(getClass); isFunctionB(hasProperty); !isFunctionB(expression);
C
isFunctionC(Test); isFunctionC(getClass); isFunctionC(hasProperty); !isFunctionC(expression);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
B
C
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The test case compares three different approaches to determine if an object is a function: 1. `isFunctionA(object)`: This implementation checks if the object has the internal `[[Class]]` name equal to `'Function'`. This approach relies on the JavaScript engine's internal structure and is specific to Chrome. 2. `isFunctionB(object)`: This implementation uses a simple check: `typeof object === 'function'`. This approach is more general-purpose but may not cover all edge cases. 3. `isFunctionC(object)`: This implementation checks if the object has three properties: `constructor`, `call`, and `apply` (in that order). This approach is also known as "duck typing" or "partial duck typing", which means it checks for functional behavior rather than strict type definitions. **Library and Functionality** None of these functions rely on external libraries. They are simple, self-contained JavaScript functions. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The benchmark uses a few special features: 1. `typeof object === 'function'`: This syntax is used to check the type of an object in JavaScript. 2. The use of `===` for strict equality checks: This operator is used to compare values and types, ensuring that both the value and the type match exactly. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** Here's a brief summary of each approach: 1. **isFunctionA(object)**: * Pros: Fast and efficient, as it relies on internal engine structures. * Cons: May not work in other JavaScript engines or browsers that don't support this implementation. 2. **isFunctionB(object)**: * Pros: More general-purpose, as it uses a simple type check. * Cons: May return false positives for objects with the correct `type` property but not being functions. 3. **isFunctionC(object)**: * Pros: Covers more edge cases and is less prone to false positives than the other two approaches. * Cons: More complex and slower, as it checks multiple properties. **Other Alternatives** If you want to create your own benchmarking framework or explore different testing strategies, consider using libraries like: 1. `Benchmark.js`: A popular benchmarking library for Node.js that provides a simple way to write benchmarks. 2. `Benchmarked`: Another Node.js benchmarking library that offers more advanced features and analysis tools. Keep in mind that writing effective benchmarks requires a deep understanding of the JavaScript engine, browser behavior, and the specific use cases you're testing.
Related benchmarks:
Object vs toString
Check function. typeof vs constructor + null check
Check function. typeof vs constructor + null check II
null prototype hasProperty
instanceof vs typeof function
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?