Benchmark: temporal vs luxon

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/luxon/3.7.2/luxon.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

let info = {year: 1995, month: 1, day: 1, hour: 0, minute: 0, second: 0, millisecond: 0};
let dt = luxon.DateTime.local(info.year, info.month, info.day, info.hour, info.minute, info.second, info.millisecond);
let date = new Date(info.year, info.month - 1, info.day, info.hour, info.minute, info.second, info.millisecond);
let temp = Temporal.ZonedDateTime.from({...info, timeZone: Temporal.Now.timeZoneId()});

Tests:

luxon
let d; while (dt.year < 2006) { dt = dt.plus({days: 1}); d = dt.toJSDate(); }
date
let d; while (date.year < 2006) { date = new Date(date); date.setDate(date.getDate() + 1); d = date; }
temporal
let d; while (temp.year < 2006) { temp = temp.add({days: 1}); d = new Date(temp.toInstant().epochMilliseconds); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
luxon
date
temporal

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 9 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/149.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 149 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
luxon	136347824.0 Ops/sec
date	196074240.0 Ops/sec
temporal	15306559.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

temporal vs luxon (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: luxon vs date vs temporal

Created: 9 days ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

luxon

date

temporal

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A