Benchmark: date parsing test

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@2.3.1/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
<script src='https://unpkg.com/spacetime'></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.__date__ = new Date();
window.__expected__ = '2000/01/06';

Tests:

moment/luxon
luxon.DateTime.fromISO('2022-01-02T18:08:00.000-05:00').setZone('America/New_York');
spacetime
spacetime('2022-01-02T18:08:00.000-05:00', 'America/New_York')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
moment/luxon
spacetime

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:122.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/122.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 122 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
moment/luxon	105671.7 Ops/sec
spacetime	19076.3 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to help explain the benchmark and its options.

**What is tested on the provided JSON?**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case. The test case measures the performance of two different libraries: Luxon (specifically, `luxon.DateTime.fromISO` and `luxon.DateTime.setZone`) and Spacetime (specifically, `spacetime` function).

**Options compared**

The options being compared are:

1. **Luxon**: Specifically, the `fromISO` and `setZone` methods.
2. **Spacetime**: The `spacetime` function.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

1. **Luxon**:
	* Pros:
		+ Provides a more robust and feature-rich date parsing library.
		+ Has better support for time zones, which can be important in modern web applications.
	* Cons:
		+ May have a steeper learning curve due to its feature richness.
		+ Some developers may find its API less intuitive than Spacetime's.
2. **Spacetime**:
	* Pros:
		+ Has a simpler and more straightforward API, making it easier for developers to learn and use.
		+ Is designed specifically for parsing dates in a specific format (ISO 8601), which can be beneficial for certain types of applications.
	* Cons:
		+ May not provide the same level of time zone support as Luxon.
		+ Limited feature set compared to Luxon.

**Library and its purpose:**

1. **Luxon**: Luxon is a JavaScript date parsing library developed by Oliver Allen. It aims to provide a simple, intuitive, and feature-rich API for working with dates in JavaScript applications. The `fromISO` method parses an ISO 8601-formatted string into a Date object, while the `setZone` method sets the time zone of a Date object.
2. **Spacetime**: Spacetime is a lightweight JavaScript library developed by Jérôme Etienne. It provides a simple API for parsing dates in the ISO 8601 format, with support for various time zones.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

None mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that Luxon and Spacetime both use modern JavaScript features such as arrow functions, classes, and destructuring.

**Other alternatives:**

There are other date parsing libraries available for JavaScript, including:

1. **Moment.js**: A popular library for working with dates in JavaScript applications.
2. **Date-fns**: A lightweight library that provides a simple API for working with dates and times in JavaScript.
3. **Day.js**: A modern library that provides a fast and efficient API for working with dates and times in JavaScript.

Each of these libraries has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them will depend on the specific needs of your application.

Related benchmarks:

date parsing test (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: moment/luxon vs spacetime

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

moment/luxon

spacetime

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):