Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
luxon vs datefns formatting
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
datefns vs luxon
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.26.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script> <script src="https://igor.moomers.org/random/datefns.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.ds = "2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00";
Tests:
datefns
window.datefns.format(window.datefns.parseISO(window.ds), 'yyyy/MM/dd')
luxon
luxon.DateTime.fromISO(ds).toFormat('yyyy/MM/dd');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
datefns
luxon
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand the provided benchmark. **What is being tested?** MeasureThat.net is testing two JavaScript libraries, Luxon and DateFNS, on their formatting capabilities for date strings. Specifically, they are comparing how quickly each library can format a given input string (`window.ds`) into a specific output format (`'yyyy/MM/dd'`). **Options compared:** 1. **DateFNS**: This is a lightweight JavaScript date parsing and formatting library developed by Igor Mooser. 2. **Luxon**: This is another popular JavaScript date parsing and formatting library, known for its robustness and performance. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** * **DateFNS**: + Pros: - Lightweight and easy to use - Fast and efficient + Cons: - May not be as feature-rich as Luxon - Requires manual handling of edge cases * **Luxon**: + Pros: - Robust and feature-rich, with built-in support for many date formats - Easy to use and well-documented + Cons: - May be heavier than DateFNS due to its additional features **Library usage:** In this benchmark, both libraries are used in their `format` method. For Luxon, the method is `fromISO` followed by `toFormat`. For DateFNS, the method is `format`. * **DateFNS**: The library's `format` method takes an input string and formats it according to a specified format. * **Luxon**: The `fromISO` method parses an ISO-formatted date string, and then the `toFormat` method converts it into a new format. **Special JS feature or syntax:** The benchmark uses the following special feature: * **Iso-8601 parsing**: Both libraries are using the ISO 8601 standard to parse the input date string. This standard provides a widely adopted and well-defined way of representing dates in a standardized format. In summary, this benchmark is testing the performance of two JavaScript libraries, DateFNS and Luxon, on their formatting capabilities for date strings, specifically the Iso-8601 parsing feature. The results will provide insight into which library performs better under similar load conditions. **Other alternatives:** If you're looking for alternative JavaScript date parsing and formatting libraries, here are a few options: * **Moment.js**: A popular and widely-used library for working with dates in JavaScript. * **js-joda**: Another lightweight and feature-rich library for date and time calculations. * **Day.js**: A modern library for working with dates and times in JavaScript, known for its simplicity and ease of use. These libraries may have different strengths and weaknesses compared to Luxon and DateFNS, so it's worth exploring each option to determine which best fits your specific needs.
Related benchmarks:
luxon 2 vs datefns
luxon3 vs datefns
luxon 3.3.0 vs datefns
luxon vs datefns adding
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?