Benchmark: Set.union vs Set.add

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const setA = new Set(Array.from({ length: 10000 }, _ => Math.floor(Math.random() * 200)));
const setB = new Set(Array.from({ length: 10000 }, _ => Math.floor(Math.random() * 300)));

Tests:

Set.union
const union = setA.union(setB);
Set.add
const union = new Set(setA); setB.forEach(v => union.add(v));
Set.union in the other order
const union = setB.union(setA);
Set.add in the other order
const union = new Set(setB); setA.forEach(v => union.add(v));

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Set.union
Set.add
Set.union in the other order
Set.add in the other order

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 EdgA/144.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 144 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Set.union	232700.7 Ops/sec
Set.add	124082.5 Ops/sec
Set.union in the other order	620510.9 Ops/sec
Set.add in the other order	165674.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Set.union vs Set.add (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: Set.union vs Set.add vs Set.union in the other order vs Set.add in the other order

Created: 22 days ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Set.union

Set.add

Set.union in the other order

Set.add in the other order

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A