Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
date formatter libraries -tiny
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
moment/moment vs moment/luxon vs date-fns/date-fns
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.1/moment.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.2.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/1.29.0/date_fns.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.__date__ = new Date(); window.__expected__ = '2000/01/06';
Tests:
moment/moment
var actual = moment(__date__).format('YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
moment/luxon
var actual = luxon.DateTime.fromJSDate(__date__).toFormat('yyyy/MM/dd'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
date-fns/date-fns
var actual = dateFns.format(__date__, 'YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
moment/moment
moment/luxon
date-fns/date-fns
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark test. **What is tested?** The test measures the performance of three date formatter libraries: Moment.js, Luxon, and Date-fns. Each library is used to format a fixed date string (`2000/01/06`) into a different format (`YYYY/MM/DD`). The test compares the execution speed of each library. **Options compared** The options being compared are: 1. **Moment.js**: A popular JavaScript library for manipulating dates and times. 2. **Luxon**: A modern, high-performance date and time library that aims to provide more features and better performance than Moment.js. 3. **Date-fns**: Another popular JavaScript library for working with dates. **Pros and cons of each approach** 1. **Moment.js**: * Pros: Wide adoption, extensive feature set, easy to learn. * Cons: Can be slow due to its global scope and reliance on DOM manipulations. 2. **Luxon**: * Pros: High-performance, modern API, supports more date formats than Moment.js. * Cons: Less widely adopted than Moment.js, requires some learning curve for new features. 3. **Date-fns**: * Pros: Fast, lightweight, easy to use, and supports a wide range of date formats. * Cons: Smaller community compared to Moment.js, not as feature-rich. **Library descriptions** 1. **Moment.js**: A JavaScript library for manipulating dates and times, released in 2009. It provides features like formatting, parsing, and calculations with dates. 2. **Luxon**: A modern date and time library developed by Meta (Facebook's parent company). Released in 2016, Luxon aims to provide a better alternative to Moment.js with improved performance and more features. 3. **Date-fns**: A lightweight JavaScript library for working with dates, released in 2017. It provides features like formatting, calculations, and date manipulation. **Special JS feature or syntax** None mentioned in this benchmark test. **Other alternatives** There are other popular JavaScript libraries for working with dates, such as: 1. **Date.js**: Another widely used library, although less actively maintained than Moment.js. 2. **DayPilot**: A more specialized library focused on scheduling and calendar functionality. Keep in mind that each library has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of which one to use depends on your specific project requirements and performance needs.
Related benchmarks:
date formatter libraries
date format
date formatter libraries test
luxon vs datefns vs moment vs day.js
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?