Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
String split('.')[0] + 'Z' vs slice(0,19) + 'Z' for ISO date
(version: 1)
Comparing split vs slice for stripping milliseconds from toISOString() output. Common pattern in date formatting utilities.
Comparing performance of:
split()[0] + Z vs slice(0, 19) + Z
Created:
2 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
var isoDate = new Date('2024-07-04T18:00:00.999Z').toISOString();
Tests:
split()[0] + Z
var result = isoDate.split('.')[0] + 'Z';
slice(0, 19) + Z
var result = isoDate.slice(0, 19) + 'Z';
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
split()[0] + Z
slice(0, 19) + Z
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one month ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Android 15; Mobile; rv:148.0) Gecko/148.0 Firefox/148.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox Mobile 148 on Android
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=626490" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
split()[0] + Z
7468876.5 Ops/sec
slice(0, 19) + Z
1156561792.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Compare date format checking
ISO Date parsing split vs slice
Date Split or Slice
Date Split or Slice 2
toLocaleDateString_perf
ISO-Date slice vs split
slice vs split on Date
ISO Datetime - add microseconds - replace vs slice
string.split vs toLocaleDateString("pt-PT")
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?