Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
ISO-Date slice vs split
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
slice vs split
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
slice
const date = new Date().toISOString() const sliceDate = date.slice(0, 10)
split
const date = new Date().toISOString() const splitDate = date.split("T")[0]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
slice
split
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
14 days ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/147.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 147 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
slice
2696333.5 Ops/sec
split
2328725.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its components. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark, created on MeasureThat.net, is designed to compare two approaches for extracting date strings from JavaScript's `Date` object: using the `slice()` method or the `split()` method. The benchmark aims to measure which approach is faster in terms of executing instructions per second (ExecutionsPerSecond). **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is represented by a JSON object containing: * `Name`: a unique name for the benchmark * `Description`: an optional description for the benchmark, which is empty in this case * `Script Preparation Code`: an optional code snippet that should be executed before running the benchmark, which is also empty in this case * `Html Preparation Code`: another optional code snippet that should be executed before running the benchmark, with no content **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark consists of two test cases: 1. **"slice"`**: This test case uses the `slice()` method to extract the first 10 characters from the ISO-formatted date string generated by `Date().toISOString()`. 2. **"split"`**: This test case uses the `split()` method with a regular expression to split the ISO-formatted date string into two parts, effectively extracting only the date part (before "T"). **Library and Purpose** Neither of these methods relies on any external libraries. The `slice()` method is a built-in JavaScript function that extracts a subset of characters from a string, while the `split()` method with a regular expression extracts a substring based on the specified pattern. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are no specific special features or syntax used in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to use alternative approaches for extracting date strings, some options could be: * Using template literals: `const date = new Date().toISOString(); const datePart = `${date.slice(0, 10)}`;` * Using regex with `match()`: `const date = new Date().toISOString(); const match = date.match(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}/); const datePart = match[0];` However, these alternatives might not be as efficient or straightforward as the original approach using `slice()` and `split()`, which is why they are less commonly used. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach: * **`slice()`**: Pros: simple, fast, widely supported. Cons: may not work correctly for all date formats. * **`split()` with regular expression**: Pros: flexible, works with most date formats. Cons: slightly slower than `slice()`, requires more memory. In conclusion, the original approach using `slice()` and `split()` is a good choice for extracting date strings from JavaScript's `Date` object due to its simplicity, speed, and widespread support.
Related benchmarks:
new Date from UNIX timestamp (ms) vs new Date from ISO string
ISO Date parsing split vs slice
Date Split or Slice
Date Split or Slice 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?