Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
date.now
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Date.now vs Plus
Created:
4 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/ async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() { // This function is optional, feel free to remove it. // await someThing(); }
Tests:
Date.now
/*When writing async/deferred tests, use `deferred.resolve()` to mark test as done*/ let a= 0; for(let i=0; i<100000; ++i){ a= Date.now(); }
Plus
let a= 0; for(let i=0; i<100000; ++i){ ++a; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Date.now
Plus
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
4 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 140 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=622860" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
Date.now
367.9 Ops/sec
Plus
35659.4 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
js mul vs pow
new Date from timestamp vs new Date from date-string
Date.now() loop
new Date instantiation performance
Date vs Performance.now
Some Date getters/setters
date substract day
string cast vs template literal cast
Date.now() vs Math.random()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?