Benchmark: Float32Array perf

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

function getRandomInt(max) {
    return Math.floor(Math.random() * max);
}

var a = [...new Array(10000)].map(_ => getRandomInt(1000000));
var ta = (new Float32Array(10000)).map(_ => getRandomInt(1000000));

Tests:

Regular array
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; ++i) { a[i] = a[i] + 1; }
Float32Array
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; ++i) { ta.set(ta[i] + 1,i); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Regular array
Float32Array

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/126.0.0.0 (Edition developer)

Browser/OS: Opera 126 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Regular array

27K/s

Float32Array

2K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Regular array	27,210 Ops/sec
Float32Array	2,214 Ops/sec

Float32Array perf (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `Regular array vs Float32Array`

Created: 8 months ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Regular array

Float32Array

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Float32Array perf (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Regular array vs Float32Array

Created: 8 months ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Regular array

Float32Array

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Regular array vs Float32Array`