Benchmark: TypedArray.apply vs ... (spread)

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

function makeCallApply() {
  (function() {
    // Test case 내부에서 chunk 생성
    const chunk = new Uint32Array(10000);
    for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) chunk[i] = i;

    (function test(a, b, c, ...rest) {
      // 빈 함수, 호출 오버헤드만 측정
    }).apply(null, chunk);
  })();
}

function makeCallSpread() {
  (function() {
    const chunk = new Uint32Array(10000);
    for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) chunk[i] = i;

    (function test(a, b, c, ...rest) {
      // 빈 함수
    })(...chunk);
  })();
}

Tests:

makeCallApply
makeCallApply()
makeCallSpread
makeCallSpread()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
makeCallApply
makeCallSpread

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Whale/4.34.340.19 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 140 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
makeCallApply	18750.8 Ops/sec
makeCallSpread	4935.6 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

TypedArray.apply vs ... (spread) (version: 1)

TypedArray.apply vs ... (spread)

Comparing performance of: makeCallApply vs makeCallSpread

Created: 5 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

makeCallApply

makeCallSpread

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A