Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
let vs array 2
(version: 0)
is let busted?
Comparing performance of:
arr vs let
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
arr
let b = []; function a(){ for(let i = 0; i < 10000; i++){ b = [i]; } }
let
function a(){ for(let i = 0; i < 10000; i++){ let c = i; } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
arr
let
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 126 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
arr
80.4M/s
let
79.9M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
arr
80,377,056 Ops/sec
let
79,942,128 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark you provided measures the performance difference between using `let` and an array (`[]`) to create local variables in a JavaScript function. The test case consists of two individual tests: "arr" (using an array) and "let" (using the `let` keyword). **Options Compared** In this benchmark, two options are compared: 1. **Using an Array**: In the "arr" test case, an empty array (`[]`) is used to create a local variable `b`. The array is reassigned on each iteration of the loop. 2. **Using the `let` Keyword**: In the "let" test case, the `let` keyword is used to declare a local variable `c`. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Using an Array**: * Pros: Arrays can be reused in various ways within the scope of the function, making them more flexible. * Cons: Reassigning an array on each iteration can lead to performance overhead due to the need for garbage collection. 2. **Using the `let` Keyword**: * Pros: `let` is a block-scoped variable declaration, which means it's redeclared on each execution of the function, making it more suitable for loops where the variable needs to be recreated on each iteration. * Cons: Redeclaring a variable can lead to slower performance due to the overhead of variable creation and garbage collection. **Library and Special JavaScript Features** Neither of these test cases uses any external libraries or special JavaScript features. The code is straightforward and focuses solely on comparing the two variables declaration options. **Other Considerations** When benchmarking JavaScript performance, it's essential to consider factors such as: * Scope: How do different scoping rules (e.g., block scope vs. function scope) affect variable declarations? * Reassignment: How does reassigning a variable (either an array or a `let` variable) impact performance? * Garbage Collection: How do garbage collection cycles impact performance in loops where variables are reassigned? **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring similar benchmarks, MeasureThat.net offers many other tests and comparisons. Some examples include: * Testing the performance of different variable declaration options (e.g., `const`, `var`, etc.) * Comparing the performance of different data structures (e.g., arrays, objects, sets) * Benchmarking the performance of different JavaScript engines or versions Keep in mind that benchmarking is a complex topic, and results may vary depending on the specific use case and environment.
Related benchmarks
Push to array vs Bitwise Mask
Array.push vs Spread operator
Spread vs Push when adding into array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?