Benchmark: new TypedArray() vs TypedArray.of()hgcvyuhj

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

let cache = [1,2,3,4,5]

Tests:

new TypedArray
new Uint16Array([1,2,3,4,5]) new Uint32Array([1,2,3,4,5]) new Float32Array([1,2,3,4,5])
TypedArray.of
Uint16Array.of(1,2,3,4,5) Uint32Array.of(1,2,3,4,5) Float32Array.of(1,2,3,4,5)
new TypedArray cached
new Uint16Array(cache) new Uint32Array(cache) new Float32Array(cache)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Previous results

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 9 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/141.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 141 on Android

TypedArray.of

2.1M/s

new TypedArray cached

1.6M/s

new TypedArray

1.5M/s

View exact numbers

new TypedArray() vs TypedArray.of()hgcvyuhj (version: 1)