Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
FlatMap vs For-Loop
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
flatMap vs for loop
Created:
6 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/ async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() { // This function is optional, feel free to remove it. // await someThing(); }
Tests:
flatMap
const input = Array.from({ length: 1000 }, (_, i) => [i, i + 1]); const result = input.flatMap(pair => pair);
for loop
const input = Array.from({ length: 1000 }, (_, i) => [i, i + 1]); const result = []; for (let i = 0; i < input.length; i++) { result.push(input[i][0], input[i][1]); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
flatMap
for loop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
5 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:145.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/145.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 145 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
flatMap
56460.2 Ops/sec
for loop
58772.7 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gpt-4o-mini
, generated 6 months ago):
### Benchmark Overview: FlatMap vs For-Loop The benchmark conducted compares the performance of two different methods for flattening arrays in JavaScript: using the `flatMap()` method versus a traditional `for` loop. #### Options Compared 1. **FlatMap** ```javascript const input = Array.from({ length: 1000 }, (_, i) => [i, i + 1]); const result = input.flatMap(pair => pair); ``` - **Description**: This method makes use of the `flatMap()` function, which simultaneously maps each element of an array and flattens the result into a new array. In this case, each subarray `pair` is transformed into its individual elements. 2. **For Loop** ```javascript const input = Array.from({ length: 1000 }, (_, i) => [i, i + 1]); const result = []; for (let i = 0; i < input.length; i++) { result.push(input[i][0], input[i][1]); } ``` - **Description**: This traditional `for` loop iterates through the input array and explicitly pushes each element of the subarray (`pair`) into a new result array. #### Pros and Cons - **FlatMap Pros**: - **Conciseness**: The code is cleaner and more expressive, which can lead to better maintainability. - **Built-in function**: As a built-in method, it can be optimized by the JavaScript runtime. - **FlatMap Cons**: - **Performance Overhead**: For certain operations and in specific contexts, the higher-level abstraction might introduce slight performance overhead, making it slower than a straightforward loop. - **For Loop Pros**: - **Explicit Control**: Developers have fine-grained control over the iteration and can customize it as needed. - **Potential Speed**: In some cases, especially with large datasets or complex operations, traditional loops can be faster, as they have less overhead compared to methods that abstract away the operation. - **For Loop Cons**: - **Verbosity**: More code means a higher chance for errors and less readability. - **Manual Error Handling**: Requires extra handling of edge cases (e.g., empty arrays) which might be implicitly managed by higher-order functions like `flatMap()`. ### Library and Features In this benchmark, not any external libraries are used. The benchmark entirely relies on JavaScript's built-in capabilities, specifically the `flatMap()` method, which is part of the Array prototype. ### Conclusion and Alternatives The provided benchmark indicates that the `for` loop executed approximately 29,521 operations per second, while `flatMap()` executed about 17,975 operations per second. Thus, in this specific test case, the `for` loop outperformed `flatMap()`. **Alternatives to Consider**: - **Reduce**: Another functional approach to flatten an array could be using the `reduce()` method, providing more flexibility at the cost of complexity. - **Spread Operator**: Developers could also utilize the spread operator in conjunction with `map()`, although it may lead to additional memory overhead. - **TypeScript**: Consider using TypeScript for additional type safety, especially when working with complex data structures. This benchmark is valuable for developers choosing between readability and performance, adapting their strategies based on the specific context of the application.
Related benchmarks:
map vs flatMap
map vs flatMap v2
flatMap or concat
reate array by lenght
flatmap vs reduce t
flatmap vs reduce t2
Array.from length vs Array
Array length to string 1
Array.from length vs for loop
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?