.includes() vs .test() vs .match() vs .indexOf() mode (version: 1)

Compare different intra-string matching styles

Comparing performance of: text.includes() vs regex.test() vs string.match() vs string.indexOf()

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:
Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    text.includes()
    regex.test()
    string.match()
    string.indexOf()

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:142.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/142.0
Firefox 142 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
string.indexOf()
1672.7M/s
text.includes()
1669.0M/s
regex.test()
32.4M/s
string.match()
20.7M/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ string.indexOf() 1,672,710,016 Ops/sec
text.includes() 1,668,988,800 Ops/sec
regex.test() 32,386,708 Ops/sec
string.match() 20,650,372 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks