.includes() vs .match() (version: 1)

Compare different intra-string matching styles

Comparing performance of: text.includes() vs string.match()

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • text.includes()

  • string.match()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    text.includes()
    string.match()

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 132 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
text.includes() 22866204.0 Ops/sec
string.match() 13144711.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks: