Benchmark: Set Union using add vs. Native Set Union

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

const first = new Set([...Array(10000)].map(it => String(~~(Math.random() * 10000))));
const second = new Set([...Array(10000)].map(it => String(~~(Math.random() * 200000))));

class MySet extends Set {
    union(other) {
        other.forEach(el => {
            this.add(el);
        });
        return this;
    }
}

const firstSet = new MySet(first);
const secondSet = new MySet(second);

Tests:

Javascript Set Union
first.union(second)
Javascript Set Union using add
firstSet.union(second)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Javascript Set Union
Javascript Set Union using add

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 144 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Javascript Set Union	4686.7 Ops/sec
Javascript Set Union using add	5785.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Set Union using add vs. Native Set Union (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Javascript Set Union vs Javascript Set Union using add

Created: 10 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Javascript Set Union

Javascript Set Union using add

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A