Benchmark: Classnames vs CLSX vs light-classnames on string concatenation

HTML Preparation code:


<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/classnames/2.2.6/index.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/clsx@1.1.0/dist/clsx.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/light-classnames@0.0.3/dist/bundle.umd.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var str = 'style';
var obj = {
 	 'style-2': true,
  	 'style-3': false,
 	 'style-4': 9,
  	 'style-5': null
};
var number = 6;
var anotherStr = 'jigucha';
var moreObject = {a: undefined, b: 'asdf'}

Tests:

classnames
let result = window.classNames(str, anotherStr)
clsx
let result = window.clsx(str, anotherStr)
light-classnames
let result = window.lcn(str, anotherStr)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
classnames
clsx
light-classnames

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/26.3.1 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 26 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
classnames	36831740.0 Ops/sec
clsx	105812160.0 Ops/sec
light-classnames	216996384.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Classnames vs CLSX vs light-classnames on string concatenation (version: 1)

In doing my new package light-classnames. I'm trying to see if my package is faster than the other two major competitors/

Comparing performance of: classnames vs clsx vs light-classnames

Created: 10 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

classnames

clsx

light-classnames

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A