Benchmark: Classnames vs CLSX vs Template Literals 2/28/2023

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/classnames/2.3.2/index.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://unpkg.com/clsx@1.2.1/dist/clsx.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var str = 'style';
var obj = {
 	 'style-2': true,
  	 'style-3': false,
 	 'style-4': true,
}
var arr = ['style-5', 'style-6']

Tests:

classnames
const result = window.classNames(str, obj, arr, 'test classname')
clsx
const result = window.clsx(str, obj, arr, 'test classname')
Template Literals
const reduced = (o) => Object.entries(o).reduce((acc, cur) => { if (cur[1]) acc.push(cur[0]); return acc; }, []).join(' '); const result = `${str} ${reduced(obj)} ${arr.join(' ')} test classname`

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
classnames
clsx
Template Literals

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:141.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/141.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 141 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
classnames	1612771.4 Ops/sec
clsx	2365382.0 Ops/sec
Template Literals	2650963.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Classnames vs CLSX vs Template Literals 2/28/2023 (version: 0)

Compare CLSX vs Classnames vs an own implementation of creating a template string

Comparing performance of: classnames vs clsx vs Template Literals

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

classnames

clsx

Template Literals

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A