Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash Intersection vs. JS filter + includes
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Javascript Set intersection vs Lodash intersection
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var first = [1, 3, 4, 5, 7]; var second = [2, 3, 5, 6];
Tests:
Javascript Set intersection
first.filter(item => second.includes(item));
Lodash intersection
_.intersection(first, second)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Javascript Set intersection
Lodash intersection
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 135 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=605838" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
Javascript Set intersection
27180728.0 Ops/sec
Lodash intersection
6300128.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Lodash Intersection vs. ES6 includes
Lodash Intersection vs. ES6 set has
Lodash Intersection vs. ES6 handle duplicate
Lodash Intersection vs. ES6 handle duplicate with set destructuration
Lodash vs. Set Intersection v2
Lodash vs. Set Intersection (1000000)
Lodash vs. Set Intersection Simple
Array vs. Set Intersection #2
Lodash vs Set Intersection vs includes vs indexOf
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?